Senate endorses provision pressuring Pentagon to clean up its books

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla. Susan Walsh/AP

Inside the Defense authorization bill now headed for House-Senate conference negotiations is an amendment to pressure the Pentagon to step up its ongoing effort to produce its first auditable financial statements or to face the consequences.

The Senate last Thursday approved provisions of the Audit the Pentagon Act (S. 3487) as an amendment to the Defense authorization bill. The language would intensify an existing congressional mandate that the Defense Department obtain its first clean audit by 2017. (Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has accelerated the Pentagon’s internal goal of achieving some clean audits by 2014.)

The Government Accountability Office has long criticized Defense for failing to produce auditable statements, placing it on its list of high-risk programs.

Under the amendment -- introduced by Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. -- if no clean audit is produced by 2017, then the Pentagon will be required to appoint a separate chief management officer to repair the department’s financial management, business transformation and information technology problems. In addition, its check-writing entity -- the Defense Finance and Accounting Service -- would be moved to the Treasury Department.

At a September hearing on progress toward auditability, Pentagon Comptroller Robert Hale said moving check-writing to Treasury would have the “opposite effect than intended,” saying Defense employees need such day-to-day operations in-house.

“Forcing the Pentagon to pass an audit is the law and will both strengthen our national defense and our economy,” Coburn said in a statement. The Marine Corps recently reported that “for each $1 spent on financial improvement, an estimated $2.77 in value was created for the warfighter,” he said.

“An audit is a critical step in making sure that decision-makers have accurate information about our spending and our priorities,” Manchin said. “One of my top priorities is to make sure we remain the most powerful and efficient military force in the world -- and we must do that by cutting fat, not muscle, from the Pentagon.”

Codification of the Pentagon’s mandate for auditable books has been applauded by outside groups across the political spectrum. “The Pentagon is the largest and most expensive federal government department but its spending has been isolated from any serious scrutiny,” Julie Borowski, a policy analyst for the conservative advocacy group Freedom Works, wrote in a blog.

The nonprofit Project on Government Oversight praised Coburn’s amendment as a tool to increase accountability. “It is an outrage that the Pentagon budget continues to grow unchecked,” wrote public policy fellow Suzanne Dershowitz, “and that it is still in violation of the law that requires it to be auditable and to produce a basic financial statement.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.