Programs for disabled job seekers are fragmented, repetitive, GAO finds


Federal efforts to help disabled job seekers stretch over 45 programs and nine agencies, “reflecting a fragmented system of services,” the latest Government Accountability Office report on duplication in government stated.

The June report has come at a time when the Office of Management and Budget must clarify its goals for streamlining programs and as it promotes legislation to renew historic executive branch authority to consolidate overlapping agencies.

The auditors found that the each of the disability programs -- which together affect one in five Americans -- overlapped with at least one other federal program. The greatest overlap is in programs serving veterans and servicemembers (19 programs) and youth and young adults (five programs). The survey found that 27 of the 45 programs were created by statute and involve 13 separate congressional oversight committees.

“The specific definitions of disability and eligibility requirements that programs use -- often established by law -- vary, which may contribute to fragmentation,” GAO wrote. “For example, officials from 34 programs collectively reported using at least 10 different definitions of disability, and 10 programs reported having no specific definition for disability. In addition, the 45 programs reported at least 26 specific limitations to eligibility, such as limiting services to Native Americans or people who are blind.”

Agencies affected include the Agriculture, Defense, Education, Health and Human Services, Labor, and Veterans Affairs departments, as well as the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service.

Though GAO did not recommend any action, it reminded OMB of past findings that it needs to clarify agency “priority goals” as called for under the 2010 Government Performance Results Modernization Act, saying OMB might consider creating governmentwide goals for employment of people with disabilities.

The law requires OMB to create a single website by Oct. 1, listing each federal agency’s programs, a tool that lawmakers have long sought, but has been made difficult by agency variations in defining what constitutes a program. OMB is pursuing a pilot project among trade and export-related agencies.

Agencies reviewing the report in draft generally accepted GAO’s assessments of duplication.

The Labor Department, however, found the auditors’ definition of fragmentation to be broad. Assistant Secretary for Policy William Spriggs wrote in a letter that several programs included in the study “were not created solely for this purpose, but rather to provide services to all job seekers -- the majority of whom are not individuals with disabilities. The report suggests that because they are available to any youth with disabilities, certain programs create a greater risk of duplication than segregated disability programs that focus on a single specific subpopulation.”

(Image via AVAVA/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.