President Bush details space budget amid mixed reaction

President Bush detailed a proposal Wednesday to spend $12 billion over the next five years for space exploration, including an additional $1 billion for NASA in his fiscal 2005 budget submission.

Under the pending fiscal 2004 omnibus spending bill, NASA would receive about $15.5 billion. The White House said Bush's proposal would boost NASA's budget by 5 percent for the next three years, and then by 1 percent in the final two years.

Bush's ambitious space program is likely to enjoy key support on Capitol Hill including that of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, whose suburban Houston district is home to NASA's Johnson Space Center. Last month he called for a return to the Moon, possibly as a precursor for expeditions to Mars.

In an Oct. 29 letter he wrote to Bush asking him to request an increase in NASA's budget when he formally submits the White House's fiscal 2005 budget request early next month. Prior NASA funding requests have "not demonstrated an appropriate level of commitment to an agency that is so important to the future of our nation," the letter states. The bipartisan letter signed by 101 lawmakers was co-authored by Reps. Bud Cramer, D-Ala., and Dave Weldon, R-Fla., who sit on the Appropriations VA-HUD Subcommittee, which funds NASA. Cramer's North Alabama district is home to NASA's Marshall Center, and Weldon's is home to Cape Canaveral.

But the proposed space program has already run into skepticism from Democrats. Asked about Bush's space agenda, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she was reserving judgment. "What is this about? What are the costs? What about safety?" Pelosi asked. House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., who noted his district includes the Goddard Space Flight Center, said the space proposal is "very exciting" for his constituents, but added Congress has to weigh the costs with other interests. "What you are going to hear in this debate, I think, is about priorities," he said. However, House Budget ranking member John Spratt, D-S.C., today called the space proposal "bizarre" and said it was more about election-year politics.

The project also drew questions from budget hawks who cited runaway deficits. Citizens Against Government Waste President Tom Schatz said Tuesday that the program "is not feasible at this time" given deficit projections that could exceed $500 billion for fiscal 2004. Schatz criticized lawmakers for earmarking NASA funds for home-state projects.

"Even if this space dream made sense, members of Congress, who have stuffed NASA's fiscal 2004 budget with more than $300 million in pork, should first be required to eliminate their parochial projects. Those projects included $3 million for an astronomy center in Hawaii, as well as $3 million for ocean and weather research at the University of Alaska," Schatz said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.