Return to Article: Federal employee union launches public service campaign
-
55159
I find it interesting that a federal union would find it necessary to conduct a public service campaign on behalf of the CS employees who promote the importance of the federal government. Curious that the current administration has no need to promote the importance of the federal government. Perhaps in their "think tank" world the only federal government activities that exist are those that are performed by contractors (who by definition are expected to earn a hefty profit for attending to public tax payer financed services).
-
54962
Seems that I have been on the cutting edge as this is something that I say to the callers of the 800 number all of the time. "I work for you, you pay my salary". As far as recruitment, I am ashamed of the promotions process. I have been in the OASIS for my achievements, have a regional commissioner citation, and I have 5 suggestion awards with more forthcoming. (No one else here does). I have been here for 23 years, and am only 42 years old. For some reason, I can't get promoted to save my life. Surely does not have anything to do with my work. I consistently make the so called "best qualified" list but to no avail. College students and relatives seem to beat me out hands down. None of which helps the retention process.
-
54937
As the previous comments showed, there are indeed two animals being discussed here.
1. The government as an employer, And 2. The government employee.
While, after 30 years of federal service, I must commend any organization that fights negative stereotyping of civil servants and our government; still, as the elected representatives of our working force, I think perhaps a better use of these funds would be to address the grass roots (and organizational) problems with NSPS implementation.
Okay, my preference would be to do both and I have NO idea how you could do that.
Still, I feel a desperate need to educate the next POTUS and the incoming and incumbent congressional representatives to fears of their workers and the pitfalls of straying from our meritocracy roots to a system based on nepotism, cronyism, and which survives only in shrouds of mystery and unquestionable tactics.
-
54926
I will be more than happy to DONATE my time to tell the new recuits the TRUTH about the FAA and how they treat their employees. No need to window dress Govt. service. The Bush administration and "pay for Performance" has ruined any chance of enticing hard working young Americans from seeking any job with the Govt. The only hope Govt. employees have is their Union and Obama getting elected.
-
54897
To reinforce this message the union wants the employees to be paid to work on the program and answer questions. Kelly said that you can't ask union folk ls to donate time and the gov't should be happy to pay for their efforts
-
54880
Good idea. It might counteract hate radio and the pro contractor gang.
Too bad the federal work force does not all pay dues. The unions must fight on shoestring budgets.
-
54846
This is very good stuff. I'll never forget the negative verbiage that streamed from then Rep. Gingrich's mouth concerning federal employees in circa 1993 when he led the effort to temporarily shut down most of the federal government. That negativism, most of which was nothing more than mindless republican party dogma, still lingers today. And this mindless dogma exclusively emanates from our friends in the Republican Party who like to demonstrate their faux machismo by 'beating up' on federal employees, and in particular the IRS.
PROMO RIGHT: EVENTS

UPCOMING WEBINARS
NOVEMBER 18
Speed bumps for Teleworking: What are they and how to avoid them?
DECEMBER 3
Achieve Program Success: Unlock the Management Information in Your Data
DECEMBER 10
Practical Transparency: Applying Exchange Networks for Mission Results











Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.