Return to Article: Taxpayer advocate renews concerns about private debt collection
-
41467
Another example of not looking at the true cost and another contractor walking away with all of the money and leaving a mess in it's wake (can anyone say GOVTRIP!)I've had to work with some of these systems - I've actually had a contractor say "no one ever said it had to work, it only needs to be implemented".
-
41329
I wouldm't classify it as suffering just making sure deadbeats pay what they owe. Personally I'd like to see more jail time handed out
-
41324
This program is a mess. It ignores previous collection arrangements between the taxpayer and IRS and due process. The regional offices are not coordinated, resulting in conflicting automated letters to the taxpayer. Appeals are bogged down for months and replies are not coordinated between regional offices. There appears to be no centralized data base.
How do I know? I am a "customer" who owes an amount that varies by $5000 depending on which office sent the automated letter. I am a customer who received a letter from the Texas office requesting my 2006 return. The next day I receive a letter from Cincinnati Ohio explaining how my refund was allocated to my debt. They have added vendor software to a government system that needs upgrading, and the taxpayers are caught suffering for it.
PROMO RIGHT: EVENTS

UPCOMING WEBINARS
NOVEMBER 18
Speed bumps for Teleworking: What are they and how to avoid them?
DECEMBER 3
Achieve Program Success: Unlock the Management Information in Your Data
DECEMBER 10
Practical Transparency: Applying Exchange Networks for Mission Results











Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.