Return to Article: Army weighs options as GAO sustains protests of logistics contract

By Robert Brodsky rbrodsky@govexec.com November 8, 2007
  • 68463

    It is unconscionable that KBR would be given another contract after the fiasco with the shower electrocutions ,fowl water plants, and mold filled tents our troops indured.

    j.strong Posted February 7, 2009 1:31 AM
  • 38962

    Interesting that the solicitation specifically prohibited a company from being on more than one team, and yet Lockheed and PAE (a Lockheed company) are on the 2 teams that are protesting!

    Jane Doe Posted December 5, 2007 3:20 PM
  • 38942

    I agree with Mr. Garrett, to eliminate all the controversay why doesnt the government just award the contract to all 5 Contractor. I mean, my goodness, the contract award is $150 billion, its enough for everyone. Our troops need to be supported the best we can offer and I believe that this will be the best solution to resolve the issues.

    Rita Brown Posted December 5, 2007 12:41 PM
  • 36998

    The only "winner" in this is KBR it is still doing all the work and getting all the money. Why doesn't the Army just award to all 5 so that they can each compete for the tasks? It's time for the soldier to get more support. The solider is the only one hurt by the current dragging of feet. Seems like KBR influence.

    Steve Garrett Posted November 9, 2007 10:30 AM

Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Army weighs options as GAO sustains protests of logistics contract
*
*
*
Vendors Solutions Center