Return to Article: Advocates of stronger state chemical security laws plot next move

By Chris Strohm CongressDaily May 31, 2007
  • 26091

    Wouldn't it be a win win for industry and the Government to include language in the Federal Regulations that indicated that the level of regulation required be site specific and contingent upon the local COOP. This way the first responders are involved the insurance industry is involved the government and the company are involved so that finger pointing is not an issue in any subsequent litigation and better yet the regulations become necessarily flexable, periodically reviewable and therefore uncoumbersome. Lets aviod a hometown Bopal.

    Wayne E Burke Posted June 20, 2007 7:03 AM

Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Advocates of stronger state chemical security laws plot next move
*
*
*
Vendors Solutions Center