GovernmentExecutive.com

Return to Article: Better training needed for emergency purchases, procurement chief says

• 14936
  

  I predict that a contract will be submitted to conduct training. Of course it will be Web-based training just as everything else is now. Then in a year or two, there will be an article on GovExec.com concerning continual problems with emergency procurement officials. There will then be a contract submitted to do a study as to why problems continue even after training has been conducted. The result of the study will be that Web-based training is neither effective nor appropriate for procurement functions. Then there will be a contract submitted for real life human beings to teach emergency procurement. This will result in a great number of highly qualified and experienced acquisition and procurement government employees jumping ship to work as instructors for the contractor which will require hiring new personnel to replace them and require more training for the new people. Anyone see a pattern here that saves any money or makes us more efficient. If you do, please explain it to me.

  ORF

  GovExec.com reader Posted February 16, 2006 6:22 PM
• 14871
  

  They had a staff of 36 with a request to add 200. You are asking these people to do the full job when only staffed 15 percent. If each person is doing the job of seven, how are they supposed to fit in time for training? Under the staffing conditions, everyone should be grateful for what was accomplished.

  GovExec.com reader Posted February 14, 2006 6:46 PM
• 14843
  

  "Our folks were not necessarily trained well in contingency contracting," he said. People had little knowledge of what contract vehicles were already in place at different agencies that could have been used to quickly buy supplies for areas affected by the hurricane." One must immediately ask "What part of Federal Emergency Management Agency is confusing here?" You would think that working at an agency with a middle name such as "Emergency" would automatically require this type of knowledge and expertise.

  One would think that this agency's primary purpose would be to provide training that would concentrate on preparing its employees to respond to different types of emergencies such as hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, and any other type of disaster that has an impact on a large portion of an area of the country or vast numbers of people. To not train personnel working in the Federal Emergency Management Agency to be prepared to respond to an emergency, would be like not training Army personnel on how to fight a battle or win a war! One would have thought that 9/11 would have provided the government with an example of what was needed to respond to an emergency, and provided the incentive to "brainstorm" about what different efforts would be needed to respond to different types of emergencies. Vast sums of money have been spent by the Department of Homeland Security, little of it being spent prudently and wisely. We need to get rid of the political appointees, and put professionals who know what is needed in charge, and we need to do it before another emergency occurs, not in the middle of one!

  JD Posted February 14, 2006 6:35 AM