GovernmentExecutive.com

Return to Article: Social Security Administration dipping into politics, report says

• 8571
  

  Let's see we are going to let people who aren't dependent upon SS vote on changing it. These people have a retirement program which makes SS look like welfare. I think this should be voted on since our elected officials don't give a hoot whether SS is solvent or not. The supplement Bush is talking about is reflective to the stock market and is a gamble any way you look at it.

  GovExec.com reader Posted March 2, 2005 8:33 AM
• 8565
  

  Someone explain to me how it's a bad idea for me to own what I pay into my retirement? I understand that there would be a period of time where the Ponzi scheme Congress set up will not be funded adequately, but heck! That's the case now where only 3 workers exist for each beneficiary, rather than the 32 or so that existed at its inception.

  I still haven't seen where those that don't like the ownership plan have suggested any alternative except "There's no crisis. It won't be bankrupt for 32 years!" I understand that this means they will likely not be in office when it happens, but sheesh! Let's get some dialogue going on how to make it self-sustaining. The Dems under Clinton were the ones clamoring about the impending crisis and the Reps claimed there was none. The roles simply reversed when the political clout shifted.

  Can't we get elected leaders in both parties (besides Bush and Clinton) that will even TRY to lead? It may be time for a new party that will do the will of the people rather than the will of the party...

  Skeptical Posted March 2, 2005 7:49 AM
• 8529
  

  As a retired federal employee, you'd think this didn't concern me, but it does. Forced into retirement due to privatization, I've had to work under Social Security for the last 5 years. I have no dreams of a luxurious, or even comfortable retirement, since I took a big hit on my CSRS and will be taking another due to WEP on my SS payments.

  But let's get one thing clear. Messing around with the Social Security Administration for political ends is as wrong as it can get! W has never had a clue when it comes to how the government works (see how he's messed with the General Schedule) and how the politicizing of them was exactly why the GS system was set up. Political appointees jump to the tune sung by the White House, but this needs to shouted from the rooftops - W needs to let Social Security do what it's supposed to do - and nothing else.

  GovExec.com reader Posted March 1, 2005 10:32 AM
• 8519
  

  "House Democratic leaders released a report Monday charging the Bush administration with politicizing the Social Security Administration by working with the SSA to alter its message strategy to support Bush's agenda."

  Bush is doing what a Chief Executive should do - how dare he! Come on Democrats, wake up! You lost the election because of this kind of trash and you continue to foster it without concern for what needs to be done! The Chief Executive runs the executive branch and so the units in the executive branch should reflect the view of the CEO! How can Democrats find that surprising? The Democrats could win if they were realistic and stopped this political sniping. Tell the facts and show the outcomes. Bush stands on quicksand! He overstates his case on Social Security, he overstated the case for weapons of mass destruction, he overstated the case for nuclear weapons development, he has gutted environmental enforcement by the administration, he started an unjust war, he is spending far too much money, he is fostering trade that takes jobs from the people that are electing him - come on Democrats why can't you beat him? There has to be a qualified Democrat somewhere in the USA (not Hilary, Dean or Kerry). Maybe Warner in Virgina but the next time is your greatest chance. If you blow it then you have lost the war! The Bush social security plan is totally wrong but the Democrats are not tell the people why it is wrong! The Democrats have been led into an arguement of whether the social security system is in crisis or not and not why the proposed actions are wrong! Democrats - get on the real issues and stop fighting the fog!

  taxpayer Posted March 1, 2005 7:01 AM