Return to Article: Air Force officials want more information about acquisition improprieties
-
7720
The whole group was in a conspiracy. This should not be left up to the Air Force to deal with. The FBI needs to investigate this matter and file appropriate charges on them all. The Air Force doesn't know enough to wipe it hind end. They only want to question her to find out what she did in order to cover their butts in case the FBI gets into this, which they should immediately.
-
7340
Some time ago GovExec told us how Ms. Druyun banished a subcabinet officer and an AF Three Star. They planned to eliminate her position. I recall that the article had her going to DOD.
That should have been a loud and clear warning about her. No civil servant has power like that. Someone was behind her then. I wonder who.
I doubt that she did it alone.
-
7339
There is the inference in the tone of this article that there was no red flags in this whole affair and that is bull. Instead of obfuscating issues with meetings, consultants, initiatives or whatever try boiling it down to the fundamentals. It all starts with people, and military or civilian, my employer just doesn't get it. Accountability should start at the top and work its way down, instead of vice versa. Remember the age old adage, "Power corrupts, Absolute power corrupts absolutely".
PROMO RIGHT: EVENTS

UPCOMING WEBINARS
NOVEMBER 18
Speed bumps for Teleworking: What are they and how to avoid them?
DECEMBER 3
Achieve Program Success: Unlock the Management Information in Your Data
DECEMBER 10
Practical Transparency: Applying Exchange Networks for Mission Results











Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.