Return to Article: Lawsuits challenge Justice effort to classify previously public information
-
5245
There is a criminal in the DOJ. One of these days the other Conservatives are going to wake up see what this administration is doing to the evidence of serious crimes being commited. I truly feel sorry for those inidviduals who continue to make excuses for this administration. History will not be kind to the man in the Oval Office.
-
5241
What is so surprising about this DoJ decision???
They refuse to allow American citizens accused of terrorism their due process right to an attorney. They refuse to release 2001 meeting lists from their Energy Legislation Bill Drafting work to GAO. They tear and tatter the constitution so that even this ultra conservative Supreme Court is forced to push back.
It should come as no surprise that this administration is classifying public information in this case. Yes, Mr. Vladek, they would classify the phone book if they could and make sure you couldn't get a copy. I would be very surprised if this administration didn't make this attempt.
-
5225
"On Oct. 18, 2002, Ashcroft asserted "state secrets privilege" over Edmonds, preventing her from discussing specifically what she did or what information she obtained. The government argued that Edmonds' information "would cause serious damage to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States."
The above statement would show evidence the hidden agenda this government has since September 11, 2001, nearly all documents concerning events, that fateful day are under lock and key, plus nearly all video taken that day has been sealed, in the name of national security. In hindsight, there appears to be an hidden agenda within the walls of people we should trust in protecting our lives.
PROMO RIGHT: EVENTS

UPCOMING WEBINARS
NOVEMBER 18
Speed bumps for Teleworking: What are they and how to avoid them?
DECEMBER 3
Achieve Program Success: Unlock the Management Information in Your Data
DECEMBER 10
Practical Transparency: Applying Exchange Networks for Mission Results











Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.