Return to Article: Pentagon official says nanotechnology a high priority

By Ted Leventhal National Journal's Technology Daily April 19, 2004
  • 4379

    Didn't Mork used to say "Nano Nano?", but then he was from a different world just like Bushwacker. How is it we have money for this and Iraq but not for equal pay parity and a host of other social hotspots?

    GovExec.com reader Posted April 20, 2004 8:38 PM
  • 4357

    I am glad to hear that we are involved in this new technology, but I wonder if we are investing enough money. I believe that the Chinese among others are trying their best to reach military goals in this field before we do, something that would be catastrophic.

    A.G. Mendive Posted April 20, 2004 6:21 AM
  • 4356

    Nowadays, any proposal that has the term "Bio", "Info", or "Nano" Technology in the title has a very good chance of getting funded. If it also contains the term "Joint", then the chances are nearly 100%.

    GovExec.com reader Posted April 19, 2004 1:38 PM

Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Pentagon official says nanotechnology a high priority
*
*
*
Vendors Solutions Center