Return to Article: Microsoft chosen as exclusive Homeland Security contractor
-
1091
I think it is absurd that a company whose software is the primary target of crackers and virus programs could be chosen for our Homeland Security. What other systems were considered? It obvious that the NSA's se-Linux wasn't. Probably the most secure operating system available and already paid for by our tax dollars. Now we are paying again for system that is the target of crackers and virus programmers. Not to mention the proprietary close source code that only Redmond gets to see. What kind of information will Bill Gates have access to when there is no peer review of the code that runs the systems? What cost are the taxpayers going to be subjected to now? 5 years from now? What percent increase in Microsoft Licensing fees will be tolerated? When you don't have to pay for an Operating System you can afford more hardware. I believe IBM or Hewlett Packard systems running Redhat Linux or Debian/GNU Linux with the NSA's SE-Linux kernel patch would provide for greater Home Land Security at a much better price.
-
1075
Comments from various Reservists who work with technology, who find this less than surprising, but very amusing!
--Interesting how the agency charged with providing security for all of us chose the least secure platform and server. HA! At least the Army was smart enough to go with OS X Server!
--It would be interesting to know which MS Server Version they will be using. MS Windows 2003 Server which just came on the market, already has security issues and MS says they won't fix them this release. Even worse the issues are within the newly modified Browser.
--That is a laugh....sort of. Looks like some good ole' fashioned backroom backslappin'. "Martinis all around please hunneh" " Call my wife and tell her I'll be late. I got some dang celebratin' to do!"
PROMO RIGHT: EVENTS

UPCOMING WEBINARS
NOVEMBER 18
Speed bumps for Teleworking: What are they and how to avoid them?
DECEMBER 3
Achieve Program Success: Unlock the Management Information in Your Data
DECEMBER 10
Practical Transparency: Applying Exchange Networks for Mission Results











Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.