Accentuate the Negative

tshoop@govexec.com

Okay class, it's time for a pop quiz. First, a little background. Two years ago, the General Accounting Office reported on what it said were "serious weaknesses" in computer security at five Internal Revenue Service facilities. Among other problems, GAO noted, the IRS couldn't account for 6,400 magnetic tapes that might contain sensitive taxpayer data.

Last year, GAO went back to see what the IRS had done to fix the situation. Auditors found that in a year's time, the IRS had dealt with 63 percent of the weaknesses discussed in the previous report. And by the time GAO's report came out in December, the IRS said it had addressed another 12 percent of the problems.

The new report made it clear that GAO still had found security weaknesses, including some the auditors could not make public. But they concluded the IRS "is making significant progress to improve computer security over its facilities."

Now for the quiz: Which of the following was the headline that appeared on the story that went out over the Associated Press wire the day the report was released?

A. "IRS Makes Strides in Improving Computer Security"
B. Audit Finds Lack of Computer Security Puts Taxpayer Data at Risk"

Most of you will probably not be surprised to learn that the correct answer is B.

"Chronic weaknesses in the IRS computer system are putting sensitive personal information about taxpayers at risk of improper uses, including theft and fraud," the AP reported in a story that was made available to newspapers across the country and posted on hundreds of Web sites. The story highlighted the fact that the IRS couldn't locate 397 computer tapes, without noting the 6,400 figure from the year before.

Why the doomsday spin? It would be easy to chalk it up to relentless media negativity and anti-government bias. But it's actually more complicated than that. Three factors help explain why this story and others like it are played the way they are in the papers, on TV and on the Web.

The long arm of the investigator. GAO's reports are meticulously researched, rigorously reviewed and reported in dispassionate, nonpartisan terms. But the agency is the investigative arm of Congress, empowered to look into any issue that involves the disbursement of public funds. Given this role, it's hardly surprising that GAO auditors rarely produce reports that paint agencies in glowing terms.

Even in those instances when it reaches largely positive conclusions, GAO tends to hedge its bets. The title of the December report on the IRS is a great example: "IRS Systems Security: Although Significant Improvements Made, Tax Processing and Data Still at Risk."

Spin, spin, spin. Members of Congress, on the other hand, rarely sit on the fence when it comes to interpreting GAO's work. And since GAO reports usually don't make their way into the public eye unless a Senator or Representative releases them to the media, what the politicians think has a big effect on how the press plays GAO's findings.

The IRS report was released by Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., who made it clear he thought its conclusions were cause for alarm.

"The IRS is leaving the door open for computer hackers to target taxpayers' Social Security and financial information," Thompson said in a press release. "Personal information on IRS computers is at risk of unauthorized disclosure, destruction or modification, and most alarmingly, to identity theft." Note the multiple hot buttons-hackers, Social Security, financial information, personal information, identity theft-pushed in just two sentences.

A higher standard. The AP largely bought Thompson's spin on the report. But that doesn't necessarily mean that its reporter simply wanted to cast the agency in a bad light, or assumed that no one would want to read a story about a federal agency improving its operations.

Media organizations have long taken the view that in representing the public's interest, they must hold the government to the highest possible standards. In a case like this, it's fairly easy to see why.

The IRS may have done a terrific job in a short period of time fixing the vast majority of its systems security problems. But it still couldn't account for nearly 400 computer tapes likely to be loaded with sensitive information. And it isn't really unfair to suggest that the only acceptable number of missing tapes is zero.

There's no quicker way to light a fire under an agency than to give it bad press. Following the 1997 GAO report, and the negative media coverage that accompanied it, the IRS swiftly moved to create an Office of Systems Standards and Evaluation. The office includes more than 60 security, privacy and computer experts, Brian Friel noted in a report for GovExec.com.

Obviously, the IRS is now bending over backward to make sure it has no security holes whatsoever the next time GAO comes around. And that's not a bad thing-even though if the IRS succeeds, you'll probably never read about it.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.