The Duplication Refrain

The duplication refrain is crucial in the rhetoric of cutting back government.

Duplication and overlap, fraud, waste and abuse: You've heard these words again and again in the bedrock critique of modern government at the federal level. The refrain no doubt contributed to the finding last year, in a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, that only 22 percent of Americans trust the federal government in Washington "almost always or most of the time."

Little things count. Duplication and overlap and fraud symbolize Washington's profligate ways, even if curing them altogether would not contribute much to solving the nation's fiscal mess.

So it is that the Government Accountability Office has a best-seller on its hands with a March report titled "Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars and Enhance Revenue." Within a month of its release, the 340-page document had been downloaded more than 100,000 times, according to GAO Chief Operating Officer Patricia A. Dalton, making it four times as popular as any other report the watchdog agency has published. Already several congressional hearings have centered on its findings. And no wonder: The report's treasure-trove of stuff is enough to make a citizen cringe.

"Waste and duplication" were among the first words House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., uttered in early April as he described his long-range fiscal plan. By Ryan's estimate, cutting duplication would save $100 billion, just pennies in a 10-year program to cut spending by $5.8 trillion, but important to the rhetoric of those who would shrink the public sector.

GAO's report results from a yearlong effort by agency staff to bring together and summarize the conclusions of many of their investigations. It gains considerable force both by reference to repetitive recommendations for reforms over the years and by the breadth of its analysis, covering hundreds of programs in 34 topical areas and 47 other cost-saving and revenue-enhancing opportunities. Some examples:

Fifteen federal agencies administer at least 30 food safety laws. Different agencies control various aspects of seafood and egg screening, for example-and there is no governmentwide performance plan for food safety at a time when risks to the public are rising.

Concern about quality of education has spawned no fewer than 82 distinct programs to help improve teacher quality, costing more than $4 billion a year. The Education Department now is proposing to consolidate some of this teacher training cornucopia.

The Agriculture Department and other agencies spend upwards of $63 billion on 18 domestic food and nutrition programs that "show signs of overlap and inefficient use of resources," GAO says.

The Transportation Department has scores of surface transportation programs costing nearly $60 billion a year and badly needing consolidation.

Seven federal agencies run some two dozen programs to help reduce homelessness. There's now an interagency council on the topic, and a federal strategic plan to reduce homelessness, but GAO says local service providers still chafe at lack of federal coordination.

"Where does the blame lie?" former Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., asked lawmakers during a March 3 hearing on the GAO report. Davis, now director of federal government affairs at Deloitte & Touche LLP, suggested Congress should "begin by looking squarely in the mirror . . . We can blame the bureaucracy, but in many ways Congress created the many-headed monster we bemoan in an attempt to protect its jurisdictional prerogatives."

Pending legislation to rewrite major education, employment and training, and surface transportation laws offer opportunities to pare away some of the duplication and overlap. According to Davis, such efforts could go hand in hand with agency reorganization of a kind that's now under study at the Office of Management and Budget. "Absolutely, it's the best time," he says. "If a company looks to drive costs out of the business, it will need to reorganize."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.