Government Performance Project Report Card

Here are the grades for 20 of the 30 agencies identified by the Clinton administration as having a "high impact" on the American public. Fifteen of the agencies received their grades in 1999; five received their grades in 2000. For some agencies, capital management grades were rolled into information technology grades. For more information on the project, see The Government Performance Project home page or follow the links below to articles about each agency.

2000 REPORT CARD
AGENCYAGENCY
GRADE
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
HUMAN
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT
MANAGING
FOR RESULTS
 
Coast GuardABAAAATop-notch planning and performance budgeting overcome short staffing and fraying equipment.
Army Corps of Engineers BBABBBManagement systems are generally strong; where weaknesses exist, leaders are seeking solutions.
Veterans Benefits AdministrationB-CBCBBBalanced approach to performance is promising, but information systems are antiquated.
National Park ServiceCCBCCCPoor data hobbles management in every area, but problems are being addressed.
Office of Student Financial AssistanceCCCCN/ABExpectations are high that Greg Woods can change the agency into a superior service organization.

1999 REPORT CARD
AGENCYAGENCY
GRADE
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
HUMAN
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT
MANAGING
FOR RESULTS
 
Social Security AdministrationAAAAN/ABEfficient administration, emphasis on service delivery earn top ratings.
Food and Nutrition ServiceBBBA * BMaking progress toward key objective of controlling fraud.
Food and Drug AdministrationBBBBN/ABEmphasis on speed of industry-funded drug reviews raises concern.
Federal Emergency Management AgencyB BBBCBHas achieved dramatic improvements under recent leadership.
Food Safety and Inspection ServiceBBCBN/ABLabor resistance slows progress toward high-tech meat inspection system.
Veterans Health AdministrationBBBBBAReorganization, fine performance measurement put agency on upswing.
* Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationB-BCBN/ACAchieving correct mix of staff skills poses tough challenge.
* Patent and Trademark OfficeB-BCCN/ABSevere labor-management problems overshadow other gains.
Environmental Protection AgencyB-BCBBCAchieves commendable results despite rigid, stovepiped structure.
Federal Housing AdministrationB-CBBN/ACDelivers on its mission despite staffing, information systems problems.
* Internal Revenue ServiceCBCDN/ABInadequate computer systems still impair agency operations.
Customs ServiceCBCCN/ACProblems include ambiguous mission, scope of duties, inadequate systems.
Health Care Financing AdministrationCCBDN/ACY2K and other technology troubles compound management problems.
* Federal Aviation AdministrationCDCCCBAdministrator Jane Garvey makes headway against deficient systems in every category.
* Immigration and Naturalization ServiceC-DDCCCInfusion of resources doesn't solve mission conflicts, systems deficiencies.
* Agencies revisited in 2000

Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Government Performance Project Report Card
*
*
*