October 9, 2012Underwritten by Deloitte Competing priorities are slowing down federal government efficiency. Just 29 percent of federal managers surveyed give high marks to the efficiency of their agency and 16 percent say the same about the federal government as a whole. In this research report, GBC identified eight federal cost areas— payments, oversight and compliance, property management, redundancy, contract resource management, technology, workforce, and acquisitions and procurement—and asked federal managers surveyed to rank their efficiency. Read on to learn: -Which cost areas contribute most to federal inefficiency -What is the top challenge when it comes to reducing inefficiency -Which steps pose the largest obstacles for managers in cutting costs -How agencies are overcoming these challenges and completing successful cost reduction initiatives
October 3, 2012Underwritten by IBM As the November presidential election nears, it seems increasingly unlikely that lawmakers will come to a consensus on how to reduce government spending. Such indecision would put the sequestration clause into effect. Are you prepared for sequestration? Here are 3 survival strategies to help you navigate the road ahead.
September 25, 2012Underwritten by Symantec
September 17, 2012Underwritten by OpenText Agencies are generating more and more information, but is it readily available when you need it? Can it be searched, indexed and shared across agency borders to fill FOIA requests and inform decision-making? Managers indicate that information management is essential or important to agency operations, but current information management systems (IMS) receive a grade of “C” by federal managers. How can managers improve information management government-wide?
August 30, 2012Underwritten by CSC Federal agencies are currently supported by a vast network of application dinosaurs that are swallowing up IT budgets. Modernizing applications seems daunting, but with a little investment, old but vital applications can be saved and modernized for a new tour of duty.
August 23, 2012Underwritten by SAP NS2 The intelligence budget is shrinking, fast. But the missions and expectations for the intelligence community continue to grow. National Security Director James Clapper believes that capacities can be maintained in spite of shrinking budgets by investing in new IT solutions. If Director Clapper’s vision is to come true, new IT solutions will have to embody five key characteristics, as outlined by DIA Chief Technology Officer Grant Schneider.
August 21, 2012Underwritten by Polycom and Verizon The benefits of mobility are widely understood, but Executive Order 13589 is limiting the number of devices that can be issued to individual employees. As a result, Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) programs are spreading across government, allowing federal employees to use personal devices for work. BYOD is a hotly debated issue due to its great benefits and perceived challenges.
August 15, 2012Underwritten by Monster Government Solutions During Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Department of Defense (DoD) underwent its largest growth period since the Vietnam War. Now, the DoD hiring paradigm has again shifted. It is no longer about finding enough people to support a war effort, but rather about finding the right people to manage a smaller, leaner effort.
August 10, 2012 Cyber attacks represent the next frontier of both crime and warfare. Agencies are dealing with increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks that are growing at an alarming rate. In all the commotion to counter cyber attacks, however, some threats are being overlooked.
July 25, 2012Underwritten by Deloitte Driven by budgetary constraints and Administrative priorities, federal managers are considering reorganization to increase effectiveness at the agency and program levels. Reorganization of any kind can complicate daily operations and generate uncertainty among the workforce, creating difficulties for today’s federal manager. In this industry insights report, GBC assesses the attitudes and knowledge of federal employees regarding potential reorganizations and consolidations.