Fedblog FedblogFedblog
Government Executive Editor in Chief Tom Shoop, along with other editors and staff correspondents, look at the federal bureaucracy from the outside in.

Crowdsourcing the Stimulus


As the President prepares to sign the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in Denver tomorrow, the geeks among us (you know who you are!) are eagerly awaiting the launch of Recovery.gov -- the online home of ARRA that will, according to a weekly presidential address in January, allow "every American...to see how and where we spend taxpayer dollars."

Accountability is the stated goal, but notice the language there: Every American can see how the ARRA money is spent. Well, that's fine, but what happens if a citizen doesn't like something they see? This is a non-trivial question, because it gets to the key question of exactly how the Obama administration will define "accountability"? While there's no question that breaking down multi-hundred-page legislation into a comprehensible format is a valuable public service, it still keeps the citizen at the end of the process, letting them witness the results of government deliberations but not actually inform them.

This is important because Recovery.gov isn't the only game in town. Meet Stimulus Watch, a site that compiles individual stimulus projects on a wiki-based site and asks users to comment on them and rate them in terms of perceived importance. Could this kind of model ever be incorporated directly into government?

There are some difficulties. First of all, the site doesn't mirror ARRA exactly: As the site's authors acknowledge, it is based on a list of shovel-ready projects issued by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the projects don't really align with how funding is allocated in the actual stimulus bill. More broadly, there's the question of whether you want this kind of thing "crowdsourced": There's a matter of fact about how many jobs a given project will create, regardless of how many votes it gets. Do we really want the crowd that kept Sanjaya on American Idol for two months determining federal infrastructure spending?

But one thing that Recovery.gov could incorporate is the wiki functionality that lets folks on the ground add their own knowledge about how projects are going. Think the workers on that highway repaving job are taking super-sized lunch breaks? Know a better way to educate folks in your community about the relief they may be entitled to? Let government know! $787 billion is a lot of money, and enlisting citizens in keeping track of it all would be a good first step in bridging the gap from merely transparent government to actual participatory government.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.