Obama directive would politicize contracting, senator says
- By Katy O'Donnell
- May 20, 2011
- Comments
"In true Orwellian fashion, the draft order suggests that the only way to keep politics out of the contracting process is to include political information with every contract offer," Collins writes, adding later that "this would inevitably have a chilling effect on the First Amendment rights of individuals to contribute to the political causes and candidates of their choice."
Collins's argument is an idealistic one: "The administration's proposal violates the fundamental principle that federal contracts should be awarded free from political considerations and be based on the best value to taxpayers."
Collins, the ranking Republican on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, charges that federal contracting officials would use the information to select the winning bidder. The order's proponents, meanwhile, note that since there are already so many suspicions about the politics involved in awarding federal contracts, putting everything on the table will only make the process fairer.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Older Feds Aren't Playing to Their Strengths
Is It Too Hard to Fire Misbehaving Feds?
Americans Still Like the Postal Service
A Forced 4-Day Weekend for Many Feds
No More Tax-Cheating Feds, Senators Say
Video: The Daily Show on Apple's Taxes
Cutting costs: Inside the effort to improve the efficiency of federal operations
Sponsored
3 Ways Data is Improving DoD Performance
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
