Courts call capital planning to order

For federal judges, the phrase "Meet me in my chambers!" commands immediate respect. But a decade ago, many newly confirmed judges couldn't utter such a command because poor workspace planning often left them without offices for weeks.

According to Ross Eisenman, chief of the policy and resource management staff at the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AOC), the judiciary's process for figuring out space needs was ad hoc at best. "Only after a new judge was confirmed did the facilities planning process begin," he said. "Judges were sitting around in libraries just waiting to have a place to work."

Finding a permanent workspace for a judge took between 18 months and seven years, a 1987 National Academy of Public Administration study found. The report also warned that the judicial branch did not adequately plan for both the quantity and the quality of its future housing needs. New courthouses were needed to replace aging facilities that did not meet basic security specifications, such as secured corridors. Modern courthouses also required flexibility to accommodate future technology changes. Raised floors, GSA discovered, were necessary to hide computer and media wires prevalent in modern courtrooms.

So, in 1988, the AOC created the Long-Range Facilities Planning (LRFP) process, which recently won an award for its innovative approach to property management. The LRFP uses statistical models to project long-range staffing and space needs for the 94 U.S. judicial districts. The program uses historical data as a baseline to forecast future caseload levels. Area demographics, economic data and criminal activity reports are also used to anticipate caseload growth and subsequent staffing needs at each court level. Growth projections are then used to estimate future courthouse space needs. Individuals at the U.S. Attorney's office and at the court unit level review projections to determine if the computer-generated figures need adjustment.

The LRFP process can project space needs in 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year increments. Since its implementation, the LRFP has identified 157 new necessary courthouse projects. As a result, GSA began a building program in 1991 to replace outdated court facilities and accommodate growth in the federal court system. Of the 157 identified building projects, 48 are fully funded, 16 are partially funded, 23 are not yet funded, and 70 are projected for the year 2004 and beyond. According to the AOC, these projects combine to make the new program the largest public works project authorized by Congress in United States history.

One of the practical results of the planning process is an effort to prioritize building projects, said Bill Lehman, the AOC's acting assistant director for facilities, security and administrative services. "Congress placed a $500 million annual cap on the amount they would spend on courthouse construction. By prioritizing our building projects, we help Congress decide how to make the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars," he said.

The General Accounting Office, Congress and the Office of Management and Budget have identified capital planning as a problem area for managers throughout the federal government.

"Prudent capital planning can help agencies to make the most of limited resources, while failure to make timely and effective capital acquisitions can result in increased long-term costs," Paul L. Posner, GAO's director of budget issues, told the President's Commission to Study Capital Budgeting in March. "Our past work has identified a variety of federal capital projects where acquisitions have yielded poor results-costing more than anticipated, falling behind schedule, and failing to meet mission needs and goals."

The AOC's facilities planning process is easily transferable to other federal agencies, provided the agency has a database of historical information that can be used for forecasting facility needs, Lehman said. The Patent and Trademark Office's records on patent applications or the Veterans Administration's benefit claims data are examples of such historical information. Agencies wishing to replicate the AOC's efforts should take the following steps, Lehman said:

  1. Identify the primary measure that tracks the agency's workload. For example, the IRS might consider tax returns a workload measure. Hospitals might use number of operations performed.
  2. Create a database of historical workload data.
  3. Use statistics to determine how many personnel and how much space is needed for different workload levels.
  4. Project the agency's future growth needs based on these relationships.
  5. Organize a review committee of responsible parties to assess and refine the projections.
  6. Apply the process to each organization in the agency to create a national plan.
  7. Update the workload data on a regular basis to ensure projection accuracy.

GSA recently honored the AOC for the facility planning process with its Annual Achievement Award for Real Property Innovation. The award honors achievements in the federal real property community and was created to communicate best practices and policies among real property professionals and federal agencies.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.