TOPICS

Agencies are spreading their wings and exploring social media outlets from YouTube to Twitter.

Federal agencies don't have a reputation for being hip when it comes to Internet outreach, but more government leaders are starting to see the upside of using social media to deliver their messages and connect with taxpayers.

"Of course it does run the gamut and there are pockets of resistance [to sharing information online], but we ignore that stereotype," says Bev Godwin, director of USA.gov and Web best practices at the General Services Administration's Federal Citizen Information Center. "And that's why we like to point out where things are being done around government, because it shows people overcame the barriers."

From the GSA-run blog GovGab to the Defense Department's almost daily roundtable with military bloggers to the long list of agencies posting on the microblogging site Twitter, a quick scan of the Web shows that agencies are going outside their comfort zone to disseminate information across a range of platforms. While getting on board with these new media tools has taken a culture change, agency leaders have begun to realize that when citizens search for information from the government, they want to use the same avenues they do in their everyday lives.

"The whole goal is to get information out where the people are going," Godwin says. "They're going to YouTube, not government video sites. They're going to Facebook, so we're trying to get there. We need to syndicate government content so we can put it where people already are. The public should be able to choose what channel they use."

Despite the growing enthusiasm for social media, some uniquely governmental barriers remain. For example, GSA has been working for months to establish a federal government channel on YouTube, but has struggled with certain aspects of the terms of service. Many social media sites like Facebook and Twitter require users to sign an agreement that allows advertising and establishes legal jurisdiction and indemnity, among other things. These agreements can be problematic for government users, who operate under their own rules and policies.

"There's a different risk tolerance in every agency - for security, legal issues, different interpretations of those laws," Godwin says. "But as we're building government space online, there are still some issues. We can't sign away indemnity nor can we say that if there's an issue California law will prevail, because if a federal agency is involved, it's always federal law."

When it comes to defense and intelligence information, there are obvious concerns about security as well. "The free flow and sharing of information is diametrically opposed to some of the security things people are obligated to protect," says Maxine Teller, the Defense Department's new media strategist. Despite this apparent conflict, Teller says the intelligence community is among the most progressive in using Internet tools. She points to Intellipedia, its version of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, as a good example. "If the intelligence community can do it, the rest of government probably can too," she says.

Government communication and technology leaders are extremely optimistic about the effects the Web-savvy Obama team could have on the use of social media. Teresa Nasif, director of GSA's Federal Citizen Information Center, says her interactions with the transition team have convinced her it is committed to services, citizen engagement and transparency. "We just think that everything we've been working on over the last few years is going to be expanded and accentuated under the new administration," Nasif says.

Many are hopeful that the Obama administration's pro-new media attitude and familiarity will bring policy changes. Scott Burns, chief executive officer of GovDelivery, a St. Paul, Minn.-based firm providing software and services for government-to-citizen communication, says he expects security and privacy rules to be updated so agencies can take advantage of free offerings such as YouTube and Google maps. "It's very clear that they'll be engaged in updating some of the rules and regulations so the federal Web managers, who are clamoring to use these tools, will be able to use them more easily," he says.

Rule changes certainly would ease agencies' ability to use social media, but Godwin believes a firm go-ahead from the top would spur things along: "We really hope . . . the White House from its bully pulpit says, 'This is OK,' and gives agencies the comfort level to make that leap of faith."

COMMENTS

  • I find in unacceptable to see that there are federal sites being set up to represent federal facilities or federal agencies that are linking to pro-or anti- political candidate sites, commercial interests, sites requesting donations, etc. If they are going to use these sites, such as Twitter, they are good mediums, but they need to learn how to use them correctly and appropriately so it doesn't look like an agency/office is trying to get someone into office, or remove them, or get donations, or push their own personal belief agenda for the facility or organization for which they'd created the social media account.
  • I, too, agree that Federal agencies want to use the many social networks available, especially those that target the younger generation. Unfortunately this means using video. Federal regulations requiring Section 508 compliance make this medium nearly impossible to use. The cost, time and energy required to meet these requirements keeps most visual information off the net. Don't get me wrong - Section 508 had good intentions, but it ties our hands too much. and no one wants to address it for fear of appearing uncaring...
  • Ms Newell, your article is well taken, however I would also like to mention my belief that the largest challenges the federal government faces with regards to on-line sharing is within its own organizational work culture. The fact that many federal workers are barred from using information services such as Youtube and facebook services in even a small capacity at work provides me with proof enough that our government workforce is far from participating on the same par as private industry in sharing information. As someone who has worked with several civilian government agencies over the last 20 years, I am constantly amazed at the high skills and talents of many federal workers who I meet, however I am equally amazed at the inability and challenges for these same federal workers to get things accomplished because of informational stovepipes. Through years of reflection, I attribute the reason to be the difficulty in working progress through the federal organizational culture that I believe universally exists in the federal workplace. There has always been this struggle of non-accountability and a reluctance to improve on the past that I believe is an obstacle that will be difficult for the new administration to overcome. With this in mind, I agree with your article that the new administration understands the need to meet these challenges before progress can be made. Recently our new President has reached out to industry leaders to establish work groups designed to improve the way government does business. This is encouraging as I am impressed with the people selected to help the federal government move forward. Recently President Obama held a press conference introducing Dave Cote to his new panel on helping federal government to do business. Mr. Cote is the CEO of Honeywell was previously the President of TRW for a short while before they were sold to Northrop Grumman and was an executive with Private industry leader GE before that. As president of TRW, Mr. Cote attempted to change the culture of an engrained federal contractor to assume more of a streamline approach designed to change TRW to be more incentive and Six Sigma-based.