Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Scientists Are Onto Your Passive Aggressive Emoticon Use at Work

Aaron Amat/

Emoticons are meant to convey emotion over the web, but using them is a two-way street; when you throw a smiley into an email, you have to consider how it might be read, and not just how you meant it. In fact, according to a new study, emoticons in workplace email aren’t really meant to convey your emotions at all. They serve as juiced-up punctuation, indicating what tone your message is supposed to take. A happy emoticon doesn’t mean you’re happy, but it can mean that you want the recipient of your message to take what you’re saying as a positive thing.

But smileys have three primary meanings, according to the study published in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication: pushing a positive attitude on your recipient, marking a joke or ironic statement, and serving as a hedge—a word that strengthens or softens the impact of the message.

Throwing a smiley after your email signature, or adding it to a greeting or compliment, is simple stuff: You want the reader to feel good about what you’re saying, and they’ll get it. And sometimes adding a “:-)” or “:P” to a joke is a must in the workplace. If you make a joke about having spent the morning asleep at your desk, it’s best to make sure your boss won’t take it seriously (though on second thought, maybe you should just lay off the jokes in work email). And finally, the hedging: Softening a blow is no crime, but using a smiley qualifier on a request or criticism does sometimes border on passive-aggressive. Check your tone, and be sure that added emoticon doesn’t throw your work communication into smarm territory.

(Image via Aaron Amat/

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.