Promising Practices Promising PracticesPromising Practices
A forum for government's best ideas and most innovative leaders.

Sending Out an SOS in the Workplace Rankings


Federal employee job satisfaction and commitment climbed steadily from 2003 to 2010 in the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings, but have declined since then and this year hit an all-time low, erasing the hard won gains.

Not only has the governmentwide score fallen to 57.8 on a scale of 100, a 7.2-point drop since 2010, but so too have the scores for all 10 of the workplace categories that the Partnership for Public Service and Deloitte measure, including  strategic management, effective leadership, skills-mission match, teamwork and work-life balance.

This is not just about satisfied employees. Employees have a deep understanding of what is happening in their organizations and they are warning leaders that many federal agencies are not positioned to successfully meet the needs of the American people.

When asked whether they have sufficient resources to do get their jobs done, only 44 percent of federal employees responded favorably. When asked whether the workforce has the job-relevant knowledge and skills to accomplish organizational goals, a third of the workforce doesn’t believe so.

The lowest category score, only 41.2 out of 100, was in the area of performance-based rewards and advancement. Only 29 percent of federal employees believe that promotions in their work unit are based on merit and only 33 percent believe creativity and innovation are rewarded.

Pay, not surprisingly given the pay freeze and recent furloughs, is the second lowest scoring workplace category with a score of only 50.3 out of 100. But barely better are the scores for effective leadership and strategic management, at 51.8 and 52.6 respectively. Federal employees are dissatisfied with the level of information they are getting from leadership and they don’t believe leaders are doing a good job generating motivation and commitment from employees.

To put this in broader perspective, employee satisfaction in the private-sector improved slightly between 2012 and 2013, to a score of 70.7 out of 100, according to our technical partner, Hay Group. The government lags behind the private sector by 12.9 points on overall job satisfaction and commitment, but by a full 21.4 points on the question “How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a good job.”

Employees are sending federal leaders, and anyone else who will listen, a clear signal that the three-year pay freeze, furloughs, hiring slowdowns and severe budget cuts are having real consequence at a time when the demand for federal services is on the rise. It’s also noteworthy that these dismal scores don’t reflect the impact on morale of the October shutdown, since the survey was administered months before it occurred.

Nonetheless, there is some good news. Looking beyond the governmentwide results, many agencies -- like NASA, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Veterans Affairs Department -- were able to defy the downward trend and found ways to improve satisfaction and commitment in spite of the incredibly challenging environment.

Perhaps most heartening, though, is that more than 88 percent of federal employees believe the work they do is important.

To get more analysis and explore the complete Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings, visit

Lara Shane is vice president of research and communications at the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service.

(Image via Vectomart/

Lara Shane is former vice president for research and communications at the nonprofit Partnership for Public Service.

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.