Air Force Behind on Improvements to F-22 Fighter, Auditors Find

Defense Department file photo

The Air Force’s quarter-century-old F-22 tactical aircraft is being modernized satisfactorily, but the concurrent program to improve its capabilities is falling short because it lacks its own cost baseline, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday.

The stealthy, highly maneuverable plane with advanced avionics and supersonic speed -- which cost $67 billion for 182 copies -- has been undergoing both a modernization and improvement process since 2003. GAO pointed to successful management of the modernization effort to achieve precise cost and schedule changes by treating the upgrades as “a major acquisition program with its own baseline cost and schedule estimate” as well as the use of contractors.

Less successful, auditors say, is the improvement effort known as the Reliability and Maintainability Maturation Program, which is not managed with its own baselines as required by the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act. The main challenges to capability upgrades are in maintenance. “Delays in completing depot-level maintenance have translated into delays in fielding modernization increments, which could also affect future increments,” GAO wrote. “Without a comprehensive baseline cost and schedule estimate for reliability efforts that encompasses the life of the aircraft across all types of funding, it is difficult to consistently track cost and schedule progress on projects that, to date, have cost almost $1 billion.”

Air Force managers note that the availability requirement for the F-22 is under review. “Any delay in revisiting this requirement could limit funding DoD might be able to make available for other high priority activities in a time of austere federal budgets,” GAO warned.

Auditors recommended that the Air Force incorporate comprehensive cost and schedule baselines for reliability projects in its annual report to Congress while accelerating the ongoing reassessment of the F-22 availability requirement. The Pentagon disagreed with the first recommendation, arguing that the Reliability and Maintainability Maturation Program cannot be base-lined like a weapons program because “there will be fluctuations in the cost based on life-cycle issues as the weapons system ages.”

The GAO report was prepared for the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.