Vets face delays in receiving benefits due to lack of records

U.S. soldiers from the 4th Brigade, 82nd Airborne arrive to a yard where they will turn in their vehicles and equipment as part of drawdown of 23,000 U.S. troops at the Kandahar Air Field south of Kabul, Afghanistan. U.S. soldiers from the 4th Brigade, 82nd Airborne arrive to a yard where they will turn in their vehicles and equipment as part of drawdown of 23,000 U.S. troops at the Kandahar Air Field south of Kabul, Afghanistan. U.S. Army

The U.S. military has done an inadequate job of maintaining field records from activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, according on a joint investigative report from ProPublica and Seattle Times, increasing the difficulty for many veterans to receive benefits upon their return.

The report pointed to U.S. Central Command in Iraq and the Army as the primary agents responsible for the lack of sufficient records, including after-action write-ups and intelligence reports from daily combat. Confusion between the two entities regarding who was accountable for record maintenance -- as well as a lack of commitment from high-ranking officers -- led to the destruction of records, the report said.

The investigation also found the Pentagon’s focus on ensuring classified information did not wind up in the wrong hands forced many Army units to destroy their records before leaving the theater.

A lack of field reports has made it harder for service members to receive benefits from the Veterans Affairs Department, especially in the case of those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. VA said missing records have not delayed veterans’ claims as the department can use medical and personnel records to confirm service, but the investigation found a lack of reports on day-to-day activity can significantly slow down the delivery of benefits.

The report also pointed to the effect missing records will have on documenting the history of the two wars, making it harder to learn lessons from the combat. National Archives and Records Administration archivists have investigated the issue of missing records and found the reports were not properly managed.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.