State neglected GAO’s diplomatic security advice

The U.S. Embassy in Malta's security guards quarters are marked with a large sign. The U.S. Embassy in Malta's security guards quarters are marked with a large sign. Lino Arrigo Azzopardi/AP

The State Department did not follow up on recommendations made in 2009 to improve diplomatic security, a failing that may have contributed to critical staffing shortages at dangerous diplomatic posts around the world, a Government Accountability Office official said Thursday.

In a written statement presented to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, GAO’s Michael J. Courts said a lack of a “strategic review” at State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security lead to the office expanding its resources and personnel “reactively” without consideration of its longer term future. Courts referenced a GAO report released in late 2009 that said State faced serious “operational challenges.” especially in dangerous posts that needed “adequate strategic guidance.” He said the bureau had made some improvements, but State should integrate the problems Diplomatic Security faces into the department’s broader strategic planning.  

“For example, State’s strategic plan does not specifically address Diplomatic Security’s resource needs or management challenges,” Courts wrote.

The Bureau of Diplomatic Security has come under increased political scrutiny following the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on a U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Security personnel testifying at a congressional hearing in October said Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb rejected additional resources for the Benghazi consulate because she said the mission had changed, negating the need for additional forces.

Areas for improvement highlighted in Courts’ testimony include facilities and buildings, inadequate foreign language knowledge, experience gaps, “host country laws” that prohibit personnel from taking adequate precautions, and a need to balance the diplomatic mission with security concerns.

“Realistic security assessments need to be conducted and we must ensure that our front-line diplomats are provided the necessary protection to do their jobs effectively,” House Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairwoman Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., said in a written statement released Thursday.  

The State Department declined to comment for this story. 
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.