Court cases reaffirm law prohibiting discrimination against workers serving in the military

The law protecting the jobs and benefits of employees on active or reserve military duty received a boost earlier this week from two separate court decisions.

The rulings, handed down in separate cases by the Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, involve the 1994 Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act, which prohibits employers -- including the federal government -- from firing or otherwise discriminating against a worker who is serving or has served in the military. The two courts decided in favor of the plaintiffs, both of whom sued their employers for violating USERRA.

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals on Feb. 28 kicked Richard Erickson v. United States Postal Service back to the Merit Systems Protection Board, where MSPB likely will direct the agency to reinstate Erickson. The case, which has been in litigation for a decade, involves a decorated Army Special Forces sergeant major who was fired from his job at USPS in 2000 because of excessive use of military leave.

Erickson could be entitled to hundreds of thousands of dollars in back pay, damages and lawyers' fees from the Postal Service, said his lawyer Mathew Tully of the firm Tully Rinckey PLLC. "The guy is a stud," Tully said, referring to Erickson's military record, which includes a Purple Heart. "That's what makes this case so disturbing."

In a separate case this week, the Supreme Court on March 1 decided that Proctor Hospital in Illinois ultimately was liable under USERRA when one of its employees fired another worker, Vincent Staub, because she relied on information from Staub's supervisors, who complained openly about his absences resulting from his duties as an Army Reservist.

In fiscal 2009, the federal government handled 1,431 news USERRA-related cases, according to an October 2010 Labor Department report. According to the law, employees must meet five criteria for eligibility under USERRA:

  • Have or applied for a civilian job
  • Given notice to their employer prior to leaving the job for military training or service
  • Not exceeded the five-year cumulative limit on periods of service
  • Have been released from service under conditions other than dishonorable
  • Report back or reapply to the civilian job in a timely fashion.

The government requires agencies to train federal human resources managers on the law, administered by Labor and the Justice Department. But retired Navy Capt. Sam Wright wonders how well the law is understood. "I don't see there is real evidence that it's happening," said Wright, who is director of the Service Members Law Center at the Reserve Officers Association.

The Office of Personnel Management has given agencies guidance, and the Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve, part of the Defense Department, has provided more than 1 million training DVDs to American employers, including the federal government, and more than 100,000 resource guides to employers. The ESGR has 650 trained volunteer ombudsmen across the country who provide neutral and free mediation before USERRA cases reach the courts.

"Many times a conflict arises due to a misunderstanding rather than a purposeful violation of the law," said ESGR spokeswoman Beth Sherman.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.