'Don't ask, don't tell' divides secretaries, commanders

The three service secretaries now with the power to discharge any openly gay officer under the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy have all voiced their support for a repeal of the controversial policy in the past, putting them at odds with the senior military commanders.

"It's the first time in the 20 years I've spent studying the military that there has been a split between the Defense Secretary and the Secretary of the Joint Chiefs [who have voiced support of legislative repeal] and the other chiefs," said professor David Segal, director of the University of Maryland's Center for Research on Military Organization.

A directive from Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Thursday limited discharges under the policy to an elite team of five: the Air Force, Army, and Navy Secretaries in conjunction with the Pentagon's legal counsel and the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness.

Each of these officials is a political appointee. While President Obama was granted his request for an emergency stay on a district court's ruling to overturn the law, he has supported a legislative repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" since the beginning of his term.

"I think the civilians [the three service secretaries] are in line with the administration," Segal said. "In the short run, [having a team of five] is going to slow down the process of [discharging]. In the past, up until now, fairly low ranking officers could release enlisted personnel who were gay ... which made for inconsistency."

Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said he personally supported a repeal of the law in March, during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

When asked specifically if he supported discharges based on sexual orientation, Donley said he did not. Unit cohesion "does not depend on gender or orientation; it depends on conduct," he said.

However, the service's top uniformed leader, Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz has stated he does not support a repeal.

A high-profile case that may be affected under the current situation is that of the Air Force Lt. Col. Victor Fehrenbach, an F-15 pilot, who admitted he was gay in 2008 after a civilian acquaintance accused him of rape. He has been fighting for an injunction declaring "don't ask, don't tell" to be unconstitutional for two years, and he's pushing to hit his 20-year service mark so that he can receive his pension, which he feels is hard-earned after nearly 90 combat missions.

A formal Pentagon assessment of opinion within the military is due in December. Army Secretary John McHugh is in part charged with the task of speaking to service members who are gay -- a technical violation of the law if they are not discharged thereafter.

McHugh said in March that it would be "counterproductive" to "take disciplinary action against someone who spoke with me openly and honestly." According to McHugh, there was an effective moratorium on discharge based on admission of homosexuality -- at least until the study is completed.

Despite the opposition to the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" by top Marine Corps general Commandant James Conway, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus told Senate members in February that he supports open service.

"It's important to remember that we have gays in the military right now. It's only a question of whether they can serve openly or not," Mabus said on Feb. 25. "I've just got absolute faith in the Navy and the Marine Corps to carry out any mission that they're given, including this one, without any sort of diminution in fighting value," he said.

Segal said discharges had been climbing since the installation of the law in 1993 -- yet there has been a dramatic reduction since the U.S. has entered wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The military began to act "as if [it] really needs the people they've got," Segal said. "They can't let them go just because they're gay."

While discharges under the policy have been relatively low, Segal said they may go lower with this high-level distribution of power to discharge. "I certainly think [the discharging process] will go more slowly," Segal said. "The people [with] lower ranks who want to initiate such discharges will need to make a much stronger case."

Clifford Stanley, the undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness and the fourth member of the decision-making team, has sent memos urging service members not to change their behavior after the recent injunction and approved stay.

Stanley was appointed to the position knowing a "don't ask don't tell" repeal would be a focus of his time in office, Segal said.

"Fairly regularly, administrations have tried to get someone in the top personnel slot in the Pentagon who is sensitive to diversity issues," Segal said. "His positions [on diversity] probably generally played a role in the selection."

Stanley, a high-ranking Marine Corps major general, said in a 2001 speech that he still feels discrimination as a black man despite his rank. "The road is still not level," Stanley said, in a speech at the Pentagon during Black History Month. "We've still got a long way to go."

"I'm the person who goes into the company office and the first sergeant does everything but pay attention to me," Stanley said, adding that "all African Americans want" is a little courtesy and respect.

In a court deposition, Stanley -- who is part of the working group for the Pentagon assessment, as is the legal counsel, Jeh Johnson -- said that amending the current regulations could take several months. A policy change might affect housing, benefits, re-accession, military equal opportunity, anti-harassment, standards of conduct, and rights and obligations of the chaplain corps and others, Stanley said.

"To change all the implicated policies and underlying regulations will require a massive undertaking by the department and cannot be done overnight."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.