Pentagon watchdog defends office’s work

The Defense Department's chief watchdog is challenging several of the recommendations outlined in a stinging Senate report, noting they could impede auditor independence and decrease productivity.

While a highly critical analysis of audit functions at Defense's inspector general office released by Republican Sen. Charles Grassley's office on Sept. 9 raises "valid concerns," adopting some of the 12 suggested reforms could do more harm than good, IG Gordon S. Heddell said in a detailed response. The 73-page report found the IG office had strayed from its core mission of detecting waste, fraud and abuse, and was too focused on policy analysis.

For example, Grassley called on Pentagon auditors to focus on "top-to-bottom, end-to-end reviews of the Defense Department's plans and programs for modernizing its finance and accounting systems." But Heddell said end-to-end contract performance and payout audits, while useful in some circumstances, require extensive resources and time, which "would exacerbate the very issues the report highlights involving timeliness."

Heddell said a better use of resources would be to conduct a series of smaller audits based on the risk for particular pieces of the contract process, such as contract administration or vendor payments.

The watchdog also said Grassley's suggestion that every IG audit receive a pass-fail opinion could lead to misleading or inaccurate conclusions. Many program audits identify areas that need to be corrected while also acknowledging their positive aspects.

"A pass-fail grade is too limiting and would constrain auditors in providing a complete perspective in an objective and impartial manner," Heddell wrote. "Audit standards require us to communicate the results in a manner that is less susceptible to misunderstanding and present sufficient evidence to support the findings and conclusions."

The nuanced findings of auditors, the IG said, help managers adopt targeted corrective action plans. "If [the] audit [office] were to assume this responsibility, it would impair our independence," he said.

One of the major findings of Grassley's report was the IG is conducting far too many reviews of Defense policies and procedures and not enough contract audits.

Heddell, however, said policy audits help the Pentagon improve its program performance and identify critical savings for taxpayers. The IG noted one program review led department management to halt the planned procurement of 11,500 Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles and put $3.84 billion to better use.

And, rather than establishing teams of up to 100 fraud-detecting auditors, as suggested in the report, the IG said he intends to use sophisticated analytical tools focused on forensic auditing, predictive analysis and improper payments.

While the IG is not on board with all of Grassley's recommendations, he noted in the letter -- and in an initial response to the report -- that the office was reforming its procedures. The IG is planning to beef up its contract oversight efforts; direct staff to high-value audits; and expand its review of the departmental efforts to acquire, modernize and implement new accounting systems.

Heddell directed Mary L. Ugone, deputy inspector general for auditing, to provide specific proposals on how to improve the timeliness, focus and relevance of Defense audits by Oct.15.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.