Defense races the clock on 2005 BRAC implementation

The Defense Department has just 14 months left to meet the deadline for implementing the largest base realignment and closure plan in history. Contracting and construction delays have left no margin for further delays in the department's plans to relocate 123,000 personnel and execute hundreds of actions affecting more than 800 Defense locations by Sept. 15, 2011, according to a Government Accountability Office analysis.

What's more, the department is doing all this as it undertakes complex military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, restructures the Army, adds 92,000 ground troops to the ranks, and relocates to U.S. installations tens of thousands of personnel stationed overseas.

"All of these initiatives are exerting an unusually high demand on DoD's domestic facility infrastructure to accommodate new forces and existing forces being deployed or redeployed," said Brian Lepore, director of Defense capabilities and management at the Government Accountability Office, in a July 21 letter to key congressional committees.

GAO found Defense officials expect half of the 800 locations implementing BRAC recommendations will complete their actions in 2011, with 230 of them doing so in the final two weeks before the statutory deadline.

The 2005 BRAC itself is more ambitious than previous restructuring efforts because it focuses on transforming military operations, not just improving efficiency. "As opposed to simply closing bases, many of the BRAC 2005 recommendations involve complex realignments, such as designating where military forces returning to the United States from overseas bases would be located; establishing joint military medical centers; creating joint bases; and reconfiguring the defense supply, storage and distribution network," Lepore noted.

Defense has estimated it will spend $35 billion on the 2005 BRAC, far more than the $26 billion it spent to implement the four previous BRACs combined. But GAO auditors found the department isn't capturing the full cost associated with BRAC implementation.

For example, the Army had not fully reported costs for some things like temporary office space while permanent facilities are being built, and financial incentives offered to civilian employees to relocate.

"[Defense] officials do not have full visibility over the extent of these costs funded from outside the BRAC account, given that the services prepare their own BRAC budget justification material," GAO said.

Six BRAC recommendations, three of which involve expansion at Fort Belvoir, Va., are of particular concern to department officials, GAO found:

  • The closure of Fort McPherson, Ga., and relocation of U.S. Army Forces Command and U.S. Army Reserve Command Headquarters to Fort Bragg, N.C.
  • Realignment of San Antonio Regional Medical Center functions and consolidation of enlisted medical training to Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
  • Relocation of various services and functions from Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington to Bethesda, Md., and Fort Belvior, Va.
  • Relocation of various Defense agencies and offices to Fort Belvoir, Va.
  • Relocation of various Army leased sites in the national capital region to Fort Belvoir, Va.
  • Relocation of medical command headquarters to a single contiguous site in the national capital region.
GAO noted the 2005 BRAC requires the Pentagon to relocate 19,300 military and civilian personnel to Fort Belvoir and involves 20 separate construction projects with an estimated cost of $4 billion. BRAC challenges at Fort Belvoir and other installations receiving large numbers of new personnel are exacerbated by concerns that local infrastructure, including roads, schools and medical facilities, cannot easily accommodate the influx.

Defense also faces significant personnel challenges. For example, many civilian employees are unable or unwilling to follow their jobs to new locations. In the Army, which is relocating headquarters for five commands under BRAC, officials are worried that BRAC might jeopardize support for ongoing military operations during a critical period. Navy officials told GAO very few employees have committed to moving to the Naval Air Weapons Station in China Lake, Calif., creating 1,000 vacancies at the new location, where distance from urban centers could make hiring more difficult. Attracting medical personnel to staff new facilities at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, is another concern, given the specialized nature of the positions and the department's slow civilian hiring system, officials told GAO.

The Defense Department concurred with GAO's assessment, and is following the watchdog's recommendation to more fully capture BRAC costs and report them to Congress.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.