Industry officials criticize ‘quota-driven’ Defense insourcing

An Arlington, Va.-based contractor trade association raised concerns that the Pentagon's plan to bring thousands of contracted positions in-house has gone off track, according to a May 3 letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates from the Professional Services Council.

PSC President Stan Soloway said Defense components are insourcing routine commercial activities without demonstrating any verifiable cost savings. The International Association of Machinists, a union representing contractors and federal employees, sent a May 3 letter to Gates expressing identical concerns.

"From a budgetary perspective, the [Defense] components are simply eliminating fully burdened contract costs with less than fully burdened personnel costs," Soloway wrote. "Moreover, market competition, which the president has repeatedly identified as the key to improving performing and reducing costs, is not even being considered in DoD's and the components' planning. Rather, for work that does not fall into the categories you identified as being critical to the department, DoD is substituting a sole-source model for a competition-based model of management."

The Air Force's strategy might be emblematic of a departmentwide problem, Soloway said. For example, the Air Force Materiel Command's January internal insourcing guidance "assumes a 40 percent savings for every contract-to-civilian conversion." The document, which the watchdog group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility released in April, suggests that for every contract dollar cut, 60 percent is returned for civilian pay and the Office of Secretary of Defense retains 40 percent.

The 40 percent figure originated in a classified Defense Department Resource Management Directive (RMD 802), but the guidance does not provide any analysis to back up its savings claims. In fact, elsewhere in the guidance, the Air Force stated certain "nonpay tail" costs associated with federal employees -- supplies, training and travel -- were not included in the cost savings analysis. The Air Force directed questions about the plan to the Office of Secretary of Defense, which did not respond to a request for comment.

The guidance also indicated the Air Force is expected to save $561 million by cutting contracts and adding 3,301 civilian employees by 2015. Critics have argued that Defense components are being asked to meet insourcing quotas, but department officials have rejected those claims.

"DoD components are asked to insource all contracted services that are found to be inherently governmental or an unauthorized personal service contract," Defense spokeswoman Cynthia O. Smith said in September 2009 when PSC first raised questions about the plan. "In addition, DoD components are required to verify that the mission requirements are for a valid, enduring mission requirement."

The 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act and the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act required agencies to set guidelines to ensure that federal employees are given "priority consideration" for new projects as well as functions performed by contractors. Neither bill explicitly sets a quota or directs agencies to insource work.

Christine Fox, director of Defense's cost assessment and program evaluation, issued guidance in January that spelled out a process for comparing the labor costs of civilian and contract support. The guidance, however, does not include a number of costs that should be attributed to the government, Soloway said, including training and development. The document also cites the expenses incurred by Defense for contract administration and oversight, but does not include similar information when the work is performed by federal employees.

"As a result of this lack of process discipline, we are witnessing thousands of contractor employees, many of them members of a union and/or employees of small businesses (some of which face the potential of literally going out of business), having their jobs terminated, in many cases leaving contractor employees without work," wrote R. Thomas Buffenbarger, president of the International Association of Machinists.

In total, Gates has called for Defense to reduce the number of support service contractors from its current level of 39 percent of the workforce to its pre-2001 level of 26 percent. The Pentagon would replace those contractors during the next five years with 39,000 new full-time government employees, 20,000 of whom would be acquisition professionals.

The department plans to insource contracted services in areas such as logistic support of aviation systems, safety engineering, cost accounting, anti-terrorism trainers and religious support.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.