Panels back larger Army, more funds for special operations

Two House Armed Services subcommittees worked quickly this morning to approve portions of the fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill, giving unanimous approval to a nearly $9 billion allocation for the U.S. Special Operations Command, a higher military pay raise than sought by President Obama and 30,000 additional soldiers that Army leaders have said they do not want.

Armed Services Personnel Subcommittee Chairwoman Susan Davis, D-Calif., said her panel's provisions were a continuation of its efforts to help the service members and their families who are "bearing the brunt of multiple deployments, with no foreseeable end in sight" after eight years of conflict.

Her subcommittee mark would authorize a military pay raise of 3.4 percent, continuing Congress' pattern of adding 0.5 percent to the president's proposal. Davis noted this would be the 11th consecutive year Congress will give larger raises to the troops to help close the "gap" between military pay and comparable private-sector compensation.

Congress customarily gave the civilian federal workforce the same pay raise as the military until the current trend began, spurred by lawmakers who believe they must make up for meager military pay increases in the 1990s.

The subcommittee authorized the Army to add 30,000 soldiers to its authorized ceiling of 547,400, which it just reached after growing by more than 40,000.

Davis said that increase was necessary because the high number of soldiers who cannot deploy due to war wounds or other reasons is having "an adverse impact" on the Army's push to increase the time its personnel are home between combat deployments.

When Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., offered to add 30,000 soldiers during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in May, Gen. George Casey, the Army chief of staff, said he did not need or want that now. Adding those troops would cost $1 billion a year, Casey said.

During its markup, the Armed Services Terrorism Subcommittee approved $9 billion for SOCOM, a significant portion of the panel's portfolio that includes $308.4 million in unfunded priorities not included in the budget request for special operations forces.

"Recognizing the leading role that our special operations forces play in the fight against extremists and like-minded groups around the world, the subcommittee's mark seeks to enhance manpower management and improve overall readiness of special operations forces," Terrorism Subcommittee Chairman Adam Smith, D-Wash., said in prepared remarks.

Smith said his panel's portion of the defense bill, which was approved by voice vote, prioritizes irregular warfare, including counterinsurgency, stability operations and strategic communications aimed at winning "hearts and minds."

Accordingly, the subcommittee changed the Obama administration's budget plan by agreeing to authorize $30 million -- $10 million more than requested -- to support the NATO Special Operations Coordination Center in Belgium.

"These coalition forces play a very important role in Afghanistan, complementing and enhancing the counterinsurgency efforts of U.S. forces, and it is our responsibility to continue to help NATO become more engaged and effective," Terrorism Subcommittee ranking member Jeff Miller, R-Fla., said in his opening statement.

The full Armed Services Committee will mark up the authorization bill on Tuesday.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.