Panelists cite threats to U.S. computer networks

The United States is heavily dependent on cyberspace for its military, commercial and social interactions. But the vast and ever-expanding interconnected electronic networks are under constant attack and the nation's ability to defend them or to counterattack is hobbled by lack of coordination and "policy constraints," a panel of experts said Tuesday.

"Cyberspace has become a really big deal. We do our banking, our commercial activities over the Internet," said Lt. Gen. Robert Elder, commander of the Air Force's Cyberspace, Global Strike and Network Operations command. "It's really important to the Air Force... To maintain air superiority, we have to maintain cyber superiority."

The vulnerability of that capability has been demonstrated repeatedly, including an attack by hackers in June that shut down some of the Pentagon's unclassified computer systems and disrupted the e-mail system in the Defense Secretary's office, noted Rebecca Grant, a military analyst. That was one of the more significant of the thousands of attacks annually against the military computer and Web networks, Grant said.

But the potential for devastating disruption of a nation's government and commercial communications was demonstrated in April and May by a sophisticated, massive Internet attack that paralyzed Estonia for weeks, Grant said. Grant called the prolonged denial-of-service assault using a network of pirated computers -- which Estonian officials blamed on Russian security services -- "Web War I."

Although experts from NATO nations and elsewhere tried to help, the cyber assault forced the Estonian government and its major financial and commercial institutions to shut themselves off from the electronic world, Grant said in a publication released at a National Press Club session sponsored by the Air Force Association's Eaker Institute.

Because of its dependence on imagery and data from satellites and reconnaissance aircraft and communications relayed globally, the Air Force has declared cyberspace one of its "warfighting domains," along with air and space operation, Elder said. He is working to create a force of "cyberwarriors" who can protect America's networks and, if necessary, attack an adversary's systems, and intends to use Air National Guard personnel extensively in this effort, he said.

"My goal is, within a year, to have some cyber security unit in every state," Elder said.

Those cyber warfare missions could help replace hundreds of Air Guard jobs being eliminated by the retirement of many flying units as a result of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission actions.

Although the Air Force has aggressively embraced cyber warfare, all the services have commands responsible for improving the ability to quickly transmit and utilize imagery and data via the public and security Internets, and the U.S. Strategic Command is responsible for cyber security.

But Elder, retired Gen. John Jumper, the previous Air Force chief of staff, and retired Air Force Lt. Gen. John Baker said the nation lacks a comprehensive concept of operations and doctrine on cyber warfare. And its ability to respond to an attack in peace time is restricted by "policy constraints" and the difficulty in determining who is responsible for such attacks, they said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.