Biotech officials pan implementation of Project Bioshield

The program Congress established to speed commercial development of vaccines and treatments to counter a potential bioterror attack is moving too slowly, biotechnology industry officials told lawmakers Thursday.

While Congress is already considering legislation to expand "Project Bioshield," lawmakers and companies agreed implementation of the original plan might be hitting snags.

During a hearing of his panel, House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., noted the government has entered into three contracts for countermeasures under Bioshield.

"In spite of these efforts, there remains concern that [the Health and Human Services Department] is moving too slowly to award contracts and has made insufficient efforts to stockpile existing countermeasures while new and improved ones are being developed," Davis said.

Companies had harsher words about BioShield. Under the program, HHS is supposed to identify potential threats and encourage industry to produce medical countermeasures.

The theory is companies will develop vaccines and other products for which the government would be the only likely purchaser, as long as they know there is a market. Without incentives, the government might lack a sufficient supply of treatments or vaccines for bioterrorism threats such as anthrax, botulism and Ebola.

But firms said HHS is not moving quickly enough to identify threats, and that the procurement process is flawed.

HHS has not implemented procurement policies under BioShield in a way that will expand the number of companies manufacturing countermeasures, said Robert Kramer, president and chief executive of BioPort Corp. "Project Bioshield has come up short," Kramer said, adding his company is not sure it can continue to make its Food and Drug Administration-approved anthrax vaccine without more assurance the government would buy it.

Richard Hollis, chairman and CEO of Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, said Bioshield is not being used to send signals to encourage investment from private capital markets in companies that are making countermeasures.

"Bioshield has increasingly appeared to be reverting back to a more traditional government-funded research and development model," Hollis said. "As a result the breadth of technology, knowledge and discovery that will be focused on safeguarding this nation will be only a fraction of what a broader, private sector-based program would provide."

Government health officials, however, told lawmakers that they have taken important steps to boost countermeasure research and manufacture.

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said there had been "substantial progress" on that goal.

HHS awarded a contract to VaxGen for up to 75 million doses of a new anthrax vaccine, a contract to BioPort for 5 million doses of its approved anthrax vaccine and a contract for pediatric potassium iodine, which is used after radiation exposure to prevent cancer.

Congress is planning a second installment of Bioshield legislation, aimed at further encouraging companies to develop drugs by lifting their liability.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.