As questions surface, Rumsfeld defends pre-war planning
- By Amy Klamper
- April 27, 2005
- Comments
During a Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee hearing Rumsfeld lashed out at Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., when he raised questions about issues addressed in the report as well as the pre-war prediction of former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shinseki that several hundred thousand troops would be needed to execute the war plan as well as any post-war conflict.
"I am tired of Shinseki being bandied about," Rumsfeld said. "We have done what the generals on the ground believed to be the right thing."
Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that in the buildup to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, all the military service chiefs supported the war plan, including Shinseki. Myers said Shinseki only offered his best guess as to the number of troops needed in Iraq after he was pressed by lawmakers. He said Shinseki believed such decisions should be left to the commanders charged with overseeing the contingency plans.
Specter noted that while Congress is supportive of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, including the recent approval by both chambers of an $81 billion supplemental spending package to pay for the ongoing conflicts, there is "a lot of disquiet out there among the people about what is happening in Iraq, and what is happening with our discretionary budget."
Myers said the department is aggressively pursuing lessons learned from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and working quickly to implement any needed changes. Rumsfeld said the department is anxiously awaiting the supplemental funding and risks running out of money if the legislation is delayed. He noted that by as early as next week some commands might stop hiring, ordering supplies and letting contracts if the funds are not approved, and that the Army has already begun slowing obligations to make funds last in the interim.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
Is Your Privacy Worth 50 Foiled Terror Plots?
Postal Service Eyes Cuba
Tangherlini As GSA's Mr. Fix-It?
Lew Cleans Up Signature for the Nation's Currency
The Plan to Open More Military Jobs to Women
Should Leaders Ever Lie?
What Big Data Means for TSA & Airport Security
How DHS is Mondernzing Mobile Procurement
Sponsored
Event: Digital Government Success: Meeting the Call for 21st Century Government
Performance Analytics: What It Means for Your Agency
