Border, interior enforcement called severely lacking

Current and former government officials told Congress Wednesday that the nation's border and immigration security suffers from the lack of a comprehensive mission, poor information sharing and coordination between agencies, inadequate resources, inept management and bureaucratic infighting.

They painted a picture of a border and immigration system overwhelmed with illegal, and possibly terrorist, activity, even though the government has pumped billions of dollars into making reforms since 9/11.

"We miss opportunities every day in the area of counterterrorism because of a lack of intelligence that we gather [and] because of a lack of intelligence that's passed on between the appropriate agencies," said David Venturella, former director of the Homeland Security Department's Office of Detention and Removal Operations. "We're missing opportunities to gather that intelligence, to determine the right strategies and the right initiatives, to tackle these problems."

Venturella, who left government service last year, citing frustration, testified with five other officials before a House subcommittee on whether the department should merge its bureaus of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection.

Two of the panelists were union members and current DHS employees, three were former DHS employees and one works at a think tank. None supported maintaining the current structure, in which ICE handles interior enforcement and CBP is in charge of borders.

Venturella said a reorganization is needed but a merger "is not necessary at this time and may well cause the department to move backwards."

Other panel members generally agreed that interior and border enforcement should be combined.

"The dual enforcement structure of CBP and ICE has proven to be a major barrier to the accomplishment of the extremely vital mission of the Department of Homeland Security to stop a terrorist from entering our country and carrying out their dastardly deeds," said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council.

Bonner charged that coordination and cooperation among homeland security agencies has worsened since the creation of DHS. For example, he said, the government is not as effective as before in stopping border smuggling activities.

"A wall has truly been erected between the people at CBP and the people at ICE," said Michael Cutler, former senior special agent at the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, which was merged into ICE. "They have separate chains of command, so everyone now has to maintain a sense of competition. ... We can't afford that if we're fighting a war on terror and we're fighting a war on drugs."

Cutler said traditional immigration work, such as sanctioning employers who hire illegal aliens or investigating immigration benefits fraud, is being shortchanged. He added that people who should be picked up for violations are getting away because agencies are not effectively sharing information.

DHS spokeswoman Suzanne Luber disputed the notion that the country is less secure today than when the department was created.

"Every day we look at making sure this country is safe at Homeland Security ... If it means we need to shift resources, that's what we're going to do," she said. "DHS is confident that we are safer today due to additional manpower, technologies and resources than we were two years ago."

Luber said the department is not going to take a stand on the proposed merger of ICE and CBP until the issue is examined as part of a total review of operations and polices, and until the DHS inspector general completes a report on the subject. DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff announced last week that he is undertaking the review, while Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, asked the IG to do the report.

Luber could not provide a timeline, saying only that the IG report is expected this summer.

Those who testified had differing opinions on exactly what changes should be made.

James Carafano, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said the department needs a long-term integrated strategy for interior and border enforcement in order to make a merger effective.

Kenneth Klug, former associate special agent in charge at ICE, advocated for immediate change, including the merger.

"To continue under the current configuration would mean maintaining inefficient tasks, wasting tax dollars and the perpetual downslide of the employees and [their] morale," he said. "Simply stated, a house divided cannot stand."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.