Senate panel weighs urgency of intelligence reforms

The Senate Select Intelligence Committee peppered 9/11 commission members Tuesday with questions about on the merits of their recommendations and the urgency of the proposals' implementation. With 19 days remaining in the congressional session, many senators on the committee questioned whether the commission's recommendations, along with the regular work of Congress, could be completed before lawmakers return home for the fall election campaigns.

Commission Chairman Thomas Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, said the sooner the recommendations were implemented, the safer the American people would be from terrorist attacks.

"If these recommendations haven't been acted upon, God forbid something happens," Kean asserted.

Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said the national attention the 9/11 commission's recommendations generated have created a window of opportunity for lasting and meaningful reform. According to Roberts, an Oct. 1 deadline -- the date Congress is scheduled to adjourn -- might not leave enough time to complete floor action on intelligence reform and conference with the House.

"We can no longer wait to implement reforms in the national intelligence community," Roberts said. "September has to be devoted to intelligence reform."

Sen. John D. Rockefeller, D-W.Va., ranking member of the committee, said he fears that the heated political season will bring "a series of votes on constitutional amendments," rather than the real business of Congress. "We're asking to move the debate over to real reform," Rockefeller said.

Despite Tuesday's announcement of sweeping legislation that would enact the 9/11 commission's recommendations, Roberts admitted that the commission's proposal for a national director of 15 intelligence agencies is flawed.

"I'm concerned, because without real operational control, his only control is budget control once a year," Roberts said. "There is no authority to direct day-to-day operations of the CIA and the other agencies."

Roberts has proposed legislation that would transfer sections of the CIA and intelligence agencies managed by the Defense Department to the new national intelligence director's direct control.

Other senators questioned the committee members on the authority a national intelligence director would need to perform the job effectively, or whether the position would simply add another layer in the bureaucracy. They also wanted to know if the commission's recommendation would allow for competitive analysis of intelligence.

"Does the president get other views with this model?" asked Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner, R-Va.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., questioned whether creating a national intelligence director post would allow for accountability in the intelligence community. He then encouraged an overhaul in the way government documents are classified and called for declassifying the intelligence community's budgets.

Commissioner John Lehman supported Wyden's budget proposal, saying the greatest damage would be that the United States' enemies would be able to see how irrationally intelligence money is spent.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download
  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.