Calls for better intelligence data sharing intensify

How to reform the nation's intelligence community has become a popular debate in Washington this summer, and a panel of experts on Thursday offered more ideas.

The issue has become central to the investigation of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and the commission looking into it is expected to release a report next month.

The House Homeland Security Committee - a new entrant to the longstanding debate about intelligence "stovepipes," the term used to describe communications that travel only vertically, within agencies, and not to other agencies - was the locus for Thursday's discussion.

Former Director of Central Intelligence James Woolsey recommended that Congress hold executive session hearings with top officials from the various intelligence agencies and generally backed a proposal by California Democratic Rep. Jane Harman to create a new director of national intelligence (DNI).

Former Virginia Gov. James Gilmore, who headed a security commission, offered support for the currently temporary Homeland Security Committee to continue its work but said the committee that holds such hearings must be "steeped in expertise." He said a national director would need budgetary and personnel authority in order not to be a "sitting duck."

Gilmore also raised questions about working with the Defense Department, which he said has the most money, power and talent. "They don't work with the CIA, and they don't work with the DNI under the proposal, and they don't work with Homeland Security," he said.

Markle Foundation President Zoe Baird recommended that the committee focus on setting rules for information sharing. She presented Markle's proposal to create a central database for intelligence from all sources, accessible by anyone who needs more information at any time.

Several committee members raised concerns about the lack of government success in improving information sharing. "Almost three years later, all must acknowledge that, despite serious and sustained efforts by responsible government agencies, we still do not have the level of timely, routine and unfettered information sharing we know we need to prevent terrorism and respond to it as effectively as we must," said committee Chairman Christopher Cox, R-Calif.

Committee ranking Democrat Jim Turner of Texas provided a chart showing the competing information-sharing systems within rival agencies. He said that picture was further complicated by the addition of the Homeland Security Department and the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC), an interagency intelligence-fusion center housed at the CIA.

"Creating and maintaining multiple intelligence centers is a recipe for continued confusion, and the failure to coordinate the work of these various centers has real-world consequences," he said.

Several committee members and witnesses said the nation's "first responders" to emergencies, especially local police, will continue to be a primary source for intelligence. They said states and localities continue to lack access to key information and to tools for sharing it. Turner said first responders would not know who to call in a national emergency.

Separately, the U.S. Joint Forces Command on Thursday announced that it is seeking industry help in developing a more efficient multinational information-sharing environment.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.