Demand grows for government-only computer network

They said it could not, and should not, be done. A call made after Sept. 11, 2001, for a closed government intranet, impenetrable to outside cyber attacks, withered after experts balked at the potential cost and said it would not include key non-federal players in the event of an attack.

But two years later, Sprint built it anyway, and now demand is rising among federal agencies for the company's "Peerless IP," a "government grade" Internet-protocol-based intranet that in many ways resembles the original GovNet proposal.

"The thought was, 'Gee, I don't think this could ever be done,'" said Anthony D'Agata, vice president and general manager of Sprint's government systems division. But the Sprint technology is "pretty consistent" with the GovNet idea, he said.

The Bush administration has been pushing all federal agencies to utilize technology to help them communicate more freely, according to D'Agata. There always was interest in Internet protocol technology, but there was concern about the security of information traversing the system. So Sprint decided to create a private network for government, D'Agata said.

The key to Sprint's system is that it has no connection to the public Internet, so there can be no possible intrusions, D'Agata said in an interview. The absence of links, "peering points" or gateways in the system allows agencies to communicate within themselves and with specific agencies also on the network. It is both physically and virtually private, he said.

Since the late summer launch of Peerless IP, Sprint has been awarded all three federal contracts for Internet protocol network services from the National Guard, the FBI and an agency the company cannot disclose. Sprint is hopeful about several more bids in the pipeline in coming months, D'Agata said.

Agencies can modify the system that Sprint provides to add levels of security for particular information, he said. The key question each agency must decide in joining the network is what information it wants to share and at what level.

Richard Clarke, former director of the White House Office of Cyber Security, proposed GovNet shortly after the 2001 terrorist attacks as a way to ensure that the government could communicate with less vulnerability to attack.

But skeptics such as Scott Charney, a former senior cyber-crime official at the Justice Department, pronounced GovNet too costly and questioned the need for a closed network. He said the government must include the other actors who would respond to a terrorist attack, such as emergency, state and local authorities. Charney suggested a focus on better authentication tools and encryption.

The Bush administration decided to seek a minimal amount of funding for GovNet and otherwise put the idea away for further study. Then early in 2003, after noticing increased agency interest in Internet-protocol-based products and services, Sprint unveiled its new system. And the contracts have been signed ever since.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.