TOPICS

The New Year brings a new pay system for employees at the Government Accountability Office.

GAO, which has been a leader in federal personnel reform and holds an exemption from most civil service rules, is introducing market sensitivity to its pay scale. The audit agency hired the global consulting firm Watson Wyatt to conduct a study of compensation for analysts and is making several changes based on those findings.

This year, the GAO is guaranteeing that all employees with a "meets expectation" or higher rating will receive at least a 2.6 percent salary adjustment, as long as their pay falls within a competitive market range. All pay hikes beyond that will be tied directly to performance ratings. Watson Wyatt found that comparable employers were raising pay 2.6 percent this year.


RELATED STORIES

Analysts will be placed in one of four paybands, rather than three. The middle band is being split into two, with a higher compensation range available in the upper band for employees deemed to have supervisory roles.

The compensation study, which examined similar agencies such as the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office, as well as think tanks, not-for-profit groups and private accounting and consulting firms, found that GAO was paying too much for some analysts but not enough for supervisors.

Comptroller General David Walker, who heads GAO, said the agency should have conducted a market study when it launched the bands in 1989. He is encouraging all agencies moving from the General Schedule to a system of broad paybands to complete a market study at the start.

"Had we done the market-based study in 1989, I believe we would have set up four pay ranges, and we would have never had to have dealt with the...issue," Walker said. "The assumption was the GS pay ranges represented the market. Those assumptions may or may not be valid."

GAO analysts in the newly split band had the option to apply for placement in the better-paid supervisory band. Walker said decisions were made in a multilevel process, are open to appeal and will take effect on Jan. 9.

The decision will be based on three factors, he said: "What were the actual roles and responsibilities that these individuals had over the last several years? What was their actual and relative performance as compared to their peer group over the last several years? And number three, did they have the ability to immediately perform at a 'meets expectation' level or better."

Pay for the supervisory band will be up to $10,000 more than current levels, maxing out at $128,300 for the Washington, D.C., area. Only employees rated in the top half of their peers in this band will be eligible to achieve more than $118,000, however.

The lower, nonsupervisory band's maximum for Washington is $101,600.

Walker said no one's salary will be cut, but some employees' potential future earnings could be lower as a result of the market study.

COMMENTS

  • Comptroller General David Walker, who heads GAO, said the agency should have conducted a market study when it launched the bands in 1989. He is encouraging all agencies moving from the General Schedule to a system of broad paybands to complete a market study at the start. It is extremely interesting that the guy who tells everyone else what to do does not do it correctly himself! It only has been 16 years since he changed his pay system and now he plans to do it correctly. Please stop screwing with the current civil service rules -- particularly in DoD where most supervisors are military and think everyone should live in a barracks and be on call 24/7. David Walker is one of the guys that brought the government the much unneeded new accrual accounting system that generates information that is of no use to anyone and that most cannot even understand. However, Congress continues to appropriate on a funds basis and not an accrual basis. The accrual statements are totally useless and represent the ultimate in waste and abuse! The DoD comptroller cannot even issue guidance that is correct and keeps fostering a cash accounting system in an attempt to get accrual accounting - but no one points it out. The DoD IG and GAO have no clue and never audit the policies of DoD but do lean on the lower levels for reporting the wrong things, which is what the higher levels have directed! Want to save time and money -- get rid of the useless accrual accounting for government and strengthen the cash accounting system that is now being destroyed.
  • Hey RDS! Ole W took care of me with this one! It is good to vote Republican now and again! Idiot!