TOPICS

Giving thanks could be tough for Charles Paidock and his colleagues this week.

On Nov. 16, Paidock, the regional vice president and chief negotiator for the Great Lakes region of the National Federation of Federal Employees, learned that he and two of his labor union colleagues were being evicted from their Chicago offices due to an apparent clerical error by the General Services Administration.

The local NFFE chapter has occupied space in the basement of the Dirksen Federal Courthouse in downtown Chicago for 25 years, but GSA officials said they thought the office was vacant and recently found a new tenant. The union, which is challenging the eviction, must leave by Dec. 1.


RELATED STORIES

Tamara Adams, a labor and employee relations officer in the Office of Human Resources for GSA's Great Lakes Region, explained in a Nov. 13 e-mail to Paidock and his colleagues that the decision was based on "unfortunate circumstances beyond our control."

"The property management division believed that the office was not being used and have secured a lease for this space," Adams wrote. "HR was unaware of this development and was notified in fact by you that the office had been made unavailable to you. Regretfully, this miscommunication concerning the office resulted in PMD prematurely reclaiming the space."

But Paidock alleged that the eviction was not a miscommunication. In recent years, the union representative has filed a bevy of unfair labor practice grievances with the Federal Labor Relations Authority on behalf of NFFE members.

"There's no way they could have made a mistake like this," Paidock said. "A trainee would not make this mistake. They wanted to boot us out of the building."

In a statement to Government Executive, GSA said the courthouse space was provided to the union "as a courtesy."

"Given the pressing needs for space in the courthouse, GSA recently assigned the subject space to another federal operation," the statement said. "The government's agreement with the union on providing a separate office states that one must be provided when there are 35 bargaining unit employees. Currently, there are six eligible employees in the Dirksen Courthouse, which therefore does not require GSA to provide a separate office space."

The agency said it already provides an office suite to NFFE on the 15th floor of Chicago's John C. Kluczynski Federal Building to serve the needs of all bargaining unit employees throughout the Chicago Federal Center.

"The 15th floor suite is newly remodeled in compliance with all union requirements and the union took occupancy of this space on Aug. 17," the statement said. "GSA continues to be in full compliance with the terms of this contract with NFFE."

Paidock has had other confrontations with GSA. In February 2008, he was reassigned from his role as a librarian and document archivist to filling staplers throughout the Kluczynski building, where he works as a GSA program operations clerk. Paidock filed a grievance and was recently successful in four out of five claims, he said.

NFFE first signed a contract with GSA's Public Buildings Service to occupy the office space in 1984. The union, like others throughout the country, does not pay rent for use of the facility. The contract, which has been extended every three years since it was originally signed, is set to expire at the end of 2009.

"It's an obscure space in the basement," Paidock said. "It's not prime real estate. It's not the 38th floor overlooking Lake Michigan."

In the e-mail to Paidock, Adams noted that the number of bargaining unit employees in the Dirkson building "has been significantly reduced to only 6 employees and since the [U.S.] Marshall's [sic] Service has restricted access through the basement, it is not very convenient for employees to access the office."

The union's contract with GSA states, "The employer will continue to provide office space where it has been doing so prior to the effective date of the agreement. In addition, if any of the union's national council officers do not have access to an existing office, the employer will provide one in those regions."

Paidock has filed a grievance with GSA over the eviction, but says the dispute will not be settled before the new tenant is scheduled to move in. It is unclear if Paidock and his colleagues will move to the 15th floor suite of the Kluczynski building.

Paidock plans to hold a Nov. 30 protest on the Federal Plaza in front of the GSA offices. The group will set up furniture, including a desk, lamp, couch and filing cabinets outside.

CORRECTION: The original version of this article incorrectly characterized GSA's statement to Government Executive as saying the agency had failed to uphold its end of the contract for union office space in the courthouse. The article has been updated to correct the error.

COMMENTS

  • "Courtesy" or not - there appears to be a "past practice" and the agency (error or no error) did not have the right to make a unilateral and arbitrary decision. If it is truly an error then they should try to fix it and not rest on "Oh we didn't know." Based on the information reported, the Union is likely to prevail.
  • As an Investigator in the federal government for over thirty years, I am appalled at some of the ignorant comments. This contractual matter will be settled based on what is written, or not, in the contract. To express an opinion without having any facts of the contract displays a lack of knowledge and intelligence. Laws and contracts are based on facts, not what people would like to see happen and are not always based on what seems to be reasonable.
  • As the former President of NFFE Local 739, I can state the following about this space: a). it was assigned to the GSA NFFE Council of Locals for use by Local 739 for administrative purposes; b). that GSA knew of this occupancy, and recognized this long established practice; c). that GSA allowed NFFE continuous occupancy and use of this space; d). that when the union Council later assigned this space to a national official whom was later suspected of taking adverse actions against fellow union officers and perceived by many as failing to carry out assigned union tasks or otherwise doing no measureable union work while holding a position of 100% official time, that the agency did nothing to interfere with his unbridled and unconditional use of this space; e). that when the official referenced above was finally removed by the union, it is not regarded as a coincidence that GSA conveniently seized that moment to begin its actions leading to this eviction; It is my opinion that the various GSA players acted in concert to evict and harass Local 739. Readers should realize that the GSA Property Management office that controls this contested space - and which so innocently forgot about this historic union occupancy agreement - is the very office that was at the epicenter of the FBI bribery investigation that put several of its former staffers and associated contractors at the courthouse into the big house. I cast no aspersions against the current occupants of that field office. I simply point out that this office’s efforts to restore its integrity from the dark days of scandal - along with associated indictments, prosecutions, pleas and convictions - is still a work in progress. When a government office sells its soul for personal gain, or aids or abets corruption, the public has a right to act with cautious or suspicious reserve in doling out of the restoration of its trust to that institution. Up until now I had believed that this tainted office had undertaken major rehabilitative steps towards clearing its tarnished name. I am quite dubious of their innocent explanation of forgetfulness regarding the union’s assignment of this space. Perhaps they have actually cleaned up their act and the eviction action is founded upon simple innocent bureaucratic incompetence. Somehow I am not comforted by that explanation either.