TOPICS

Improper payments by federal agencies increased to $98 billion in fiscal 2009, up from $72 billion in 2008, prompting the White House to issue an executive order to combat such errors.

Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag said Monday the increase reflected two primary factors -- better measurement of erroneous payments, and the fact that federal outlays have increased as a result of the response to the recession.

"A constant error rate applied to an expanded base will cause numbers to go up," he said.


RELATED STORIES

The improper payment rate for the Medicare fee-for-service program jumped significantly, from 3.6 percent to 7.8 percent. Orszag said that increase was primarily a reflection of stricter measurement. For example, he said, an illegible signature from a doctor was now more likely to trigger a classification of improper payment than it has in the past. But Orszag acknowledged that an almost 5 percent jump in improper payments under the Medicare Advantage program, where private insurance companies offer coverage to Medicare beneficiaries, was not a result of methodological changes.

Regardless of the reasons for increases, Orszag said they were unacceptable.

"We can no longer tolerate these errors, mistakes and misdeeds," Orszag said. "Every dollar misspent is a dollar not going to help an unemployed worker, a family in need of help buying groceries, or a senior who relies on Medicare to stay healthy."

Orszag said that within the next week, President Obama will issue an "aggressive" executive order to address improper payments. It will include three components: increased transparency and public participation, accountability at the agency level and incentives for compliance.

The order will require agencies to create improper payments dashboards on their websites, with information on error rates and outstanding payment issues. Agencies will also be required to appoint a Senate-confirmed official to be primarily accountable for erroneous payments.

"As we work with agencies to find the right accountable official, we will not be locked on to the [chief financial officer] necessarily," said Danny Werfel, acting controller of OMB's Office of Federal Financial Management, who is awaiting confirmation by the Senate. "We want the person best positioned, and that might be an assistant secretary over a program [or] the deputy commissioner of a bureau. We'll have a broad view of the agency to make sure we get the right person. In many cases, it will not be the CFO."

Currently, agencies are required to set goals for addressing improper payments, but those targets do not necessarily need to involve reductions. Under the executive order, agencies will be explicitly required to reduce improper payments and have their targets approved by their inspector general.

"If agencies don't succeed in reducing improper payments two years in a row, the agency's Cabinet official and the responsible Senate-confirmed official will come in to speak to the director of OMB -- which is me -- and lay out a plan for how they will succeed," Orszag said.

The executive order will boost the resources available for states to invest in the integrity of federally funded programs administered by states. It will expand nationwide a Medicare pilot program which has recovered more than $90 million in improper payments in three states through the use of audits aimed at recovering funds.

Contractors will be required to "become part of the solution," Orszag said. Currently, if the government discovers an overpayment or other improper payment to a contractor, the vendor must pay back the government without interest or penalty. The executive order will subject contractors to debarment, suspension and financial penalties if they fail to disclose overpayments.

COMMENTS

  • "do" below hit on one of the issues with DTS - operational personnel are now doing administrative/accounting work and it isn't just at the top. All Fed gov employees do their own travel. I've used DTS - it IS a good system, but when you only use it rarely - it is hard to remember how to navigate and do everything right. At our command our Travel coordinator reviews/edits all DTS - believe me - we do not have alot of errors. Contractors: Recently a co-worker traveled with some contractors - nice people, they sat in business class, he sat in coach. Apparently their contract states that they must fly business class when going overseas. This needs to be looked at. If we do not spend the money for our own employees to fly comfortably on 13 hr flights, we should not do so for others. Besides - how much does this increase the cost of our contracts? I wonder if any of these folks complain about how high their taxes are? of course the taxes they pay, also pay for those business class seats.
  • Better yet, you should see how contractors spend the best lodging locations and get approved shile we Federal workers have to abide with travel regulations on DTS and its red flags. give contractor all they want, right? name of the game...
  • The bigger the government becomes, the easier things get lost in the details. Oversight of programs hardly exists anymore. Too bad. We all pay, not the originator.