TOPICS

Well before the election was decided, speculation began on who would fill key slots in the next president's Cabinet.

One of those positions, of course, is Defense secretary, and even before Barack Obama's election, the speculation about who will get that coveted slot has centered around former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig, a key Obama defense adviser.

That's assuming, of course, Obama doesn't convince Robert Gates to stay in his position after Jan. 20. Danzig himself endorsed Gates way back in June. As the Times of London reported, Danzig said, "My personal position is Gates is a very good secretary of Defense and would be an even better one in an Obama administration."


RELATED STORIES

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that Obama is "leaning toward" asking Gates to stay on. Time magazine stated that "the chances are said to be about 50-50" that Obama will ask Gates to remain in his post.

But Danzig has become one of Obama's closest advisers, and that, some observers say, puts him on the inside track to get the post himself. "Because they're close, and because Obama has come to value Richard's views," one former Pentagon official told Defense News on Monday, "it would seem if Richard wants to be Defense secretary, he could have it."

So what kind of Defense secretary would Danzig make? In March 2001, Government Executive's Jason Peckenpaugh wrote an in-depth profile of Danzig, exploring his management style as Navy secretary.

Peckenpaugh noted that Danzig is a "longtime student of government management" and that his "candid, activist management style won him wide acclaim amongst the service's officer corps and respect on Capitol Hill."

"Operating from the often-ignored civilian secretary's position," Peckenpaugh wrote, "Danzig convinced the Navy to rethink a host of conscription-era practices and act on ambitious technological projects. By early 2000, Danzig's performance had made him a contender for high-ranking positions at the Pentagon -- including Defense secretary -- in a potential Al Gore administration. To many observers, however, Danzig's legacy may lie in his larger effort to question all aspects of the Navy's organization and management, urging wide-ranging discussions of department practices and encouraging innovation."

When Danzig took over as Navy secretary in late 1998, the service was faced with a fleetwide shortfall of 22,000 sailors and a growing exodus of mid-level officers. After talking to junior officers about the situation, he launched an effort called Smart Work, designed to improve living conditions on ships and shift menial tasks like painting from sailors to civilians.

"He thinks that when you come into a bureaucracy you have to first work to understand its clich é s, what it holds dear," said Col. Robert E. Lee, who served as Danzig's executive assistant when he was undersecretary, the Navy's second-ranking position. "Once you understand an organization's history, mottos and culture, then you can talk about changing it."

Read the full profile of Richard Danzig from the March 1, 2001, issue of Government Executive

COMMENTS

  • 26+, It is apparent from these and other posts, that dan is a retired military type, who hates all things democratic and/or civil service. The only managers I have ever seen hired right out of school are political appointees, whose parents are well-connected politically (both parties) and I have spent many hours cleaning up after them and sometimes getting blamed for the mistake until I provide proof that I wasn't the one who made the original error. That being said, I have seen both extremes in career service, as well a Schedule C.
  • Dan, Like I said, you are obviously not in the real world of CS; not that of which I am familiar. My guess is that you are a disgruntled government contractor that has not been able to get into the CS. I have never seen a manger hired right out of school. That would present more of a problem than favoring someone without first hand corporate knowledge right out of military service. Sure you find some less responsible individuals that may make the claims you profess, but a manager of any worth would know that those excuses don’t hold up against federal regulation and scrutiny of PD’s and fulfill their responsibility to get the individual to perform the task. Again, it appears that the problem you have witnessed and is of concern is misdirected at CS personnel in general when it sounds more like a supervisor and mid-level manager deficiency, which I too have witnessed and is the point of the comment originating this discussion of your concerns.
  • 26 the only bad mangers I have seen are CS with no real world experience. They come into the job right out of school and in a year they pick up the CS mantra, "its not my job, its not on the PD, I'm too busy you'll have to authorise OT or added help. PS when am I getting promoted and where is my raise. I love the term they had their career now let us have ours!!! Just to clue you in you work for the taxpayers not the union. These men and women have just as right to those jobs maybe more than some land crab who sits in 1 location and complains their entire career. If you want preference the military is hiring why not earn it for a change