TOPICS

While the federal government will undergo an extensive political makeover during the transition period, one agency has less room for error than most. The Homeland Security Department, which includes the Transportation Security Administration and myriad other federal law enforcement agencies, goes through the same leadership changes as the rest of the agencies, but it also holds the crucial responsibility of ensuring America remains safe during this historically vulnerable period.

Joe Biden thrust the issue into the election spotlight recently when he said at a fundraiser that Barack Obama would be tested by "an international crisis, a generated crisis," early in his presidency. Despite the controversy over his remark, history shows that several presidents have, indeed, been tested soon after taking office. Cases in point include President Clinton and Somalia and, of course, President Bush and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

With nearly three years of preparation leading up to the next few pivotal months, DHS is determined to ensure the country remains safe. TSA Deputy Administrator Gale Rossides, who has been working on the transition since planning began, discusses the unique challenges that DHS, as a relatively new federal department, is facing in its first presidential transition. In an interview with NationalJournal.com's Amy Harder, she emphasized the importance of strong leadership during the handoff. Edited excerpts follow.


RELATED STORIES

Q. What is your role in the transition?

Rossides: I am currently the deputy administrator of TSA. During the transition, I will be designated as the acting administrator until such time as the next administration names and the Senate confirms a new administrator of TSA.

Q. What is unique about this election year's transition period in terms of national security?

Rossides: What's unique... for DHS and for TSA, it will be a change in administration where you will have a new president. We went through the transition when President Bush began his second term, but it was the same president and during that transition, obviously, we got a new secretary with Secretary [Michael] Chertoff. So what's unique for DHS is that this will be a change in administration where the incumbent president is new and not having been on the job four years.

In other respects, though, it is not that unusual because all federal agencies go through transitions every four or eight years as part of the democratic process. We in DHS and in TSA specifically, like all the rest of the federal government, will go through some pretty standard preparation for the transition and pretty standard processes after the transition in terms of briefing the new administration team on the agencies' programs and issues.

Q. How long has DHS, including TSA and all the other subsidiary agencies, been preparing for the transition?

Rossides: The way I'd like to answer that is not focused on the January 20th inauguration, when there's a change in administration.... I chair what we call the senior leadership team, which is all of our career executives who manage the agency. And we call them the senior leadership team because they manage it in total as a team, kind of like a corporate board in the private sector. My focus over the last three years has been to really build that team and get the agency operating at a level where the change in administrations and the change in who is administrator wouldn't be impacted during a transition period.

Click here to read the complete interview and check out the new blog Lost in Transition, a joint effort of Government Executive and National Journal.

COMMENTS

  • Oh God, give it a rest. This about the hundreth time we've heard that. Two comments. One, what we've learned over the years is that Al Qaeda does things on their time table, not ours. Two, it's not like all the career people at DHS go on vacation and stop work between election day and Jan. 20th. The people who actually do the work will still be there. And while they may not be able to make any big strategic decisions in the absence of political appointees, I'm sure there are enough competent people there to respond and deal with any incidents. Political appointees are not the font of all knowledge when it comes to security and responding to incidents. Many had little or no real security or intel background before being appointed, whereas career people actually had to compete for their jobs and show qualifications. I'm sure we will do just fine.
  • TSA plays a vital role in our National Security. There has not been another successful Terrorist Attack on the US Air Industry since TSA was formed. The only issue is that TSA is getting very FAT at the top levels of management. There are far too many senior and mid level managers at the SES and K band (GS-15) levels than are needed. The new administration needs to take a very close look at the Management structure of TSA and trim it back. The salaries that these mangers are being paid could be better utilized at the TSO level.
  • To Amy, Where did they mention the expansion of TSA? DHS is not TSA. TSA is under DHS as is customs and border protection and others. The coast guard is under DHS as well. You haven't seen any airport screeners working on a coast guard cutter have you? Nor are they screening anything at our borders. DHS was formed following the attacks of 9/11 to do exactly what the name implies, Homeland Security. The idea was to bring every form of our nations physical security forces under one command point. TSA is a small portion that was designed for Transportation Security Screening. That's what they do. That's all they do. No one else previously did this within the government and they aren't replacing anyone. And for another piece of information, TSA has been reduced in size since their first two years of operation and they continue to do so as systems become more automated.