TOPICS
TOPICS
Report warns new lethal small arms could get in terrorist hands
In the ongoing arms race between terrorists and security forces, the proliferation of next-generation, technologically advanced small arms with previously unheard-of range, accuracy and lethality could tip the balance in favor of terrorists, a new report warns.
New weapons such as simple mortars outfitted with guided warheads, precision sniper rifles, highly accurate anti-tank missiles and large magnetic mines that can be attached to ship bottoms are easier to use and more widely available on world markets. In the hands of terrorists, these weapons pose new challenges to personal security details, guards at critical sites and facilities, and cruise ships operators and passenger ferries, the report says.
These technologically enhanced small arms provide attackers with a single-shot kill capability, the element of surprise, the ability to launch attacks from far beyond established security perimeters and the means to escape after an attack, according to the report by RAND Corp. titled "Stealing the Sword: Limiting Terrorist Use of Advanced Conventional Weapons."
While the specter of anti-aircraft missiles shooting down airliners led to sales controls and technical countermeasures, the lethal new small arms have not come under comparable international regulatory controls and measures.
RAND identified five new or improved "game-changing weapons" that could shift the balance in favor of small groups of terrorists in the United States and other countries. The most worrisome weapons identified were advanced GPS-guided mortars.
Simple, often crudely constructed mortars were a favorite weapon of Irish Republican Army terrorists, and are used heavily now by insurgents in Iraq. RAND says the new guided warheads becoming available could provide terrorists with devastatingly accurate and lethal weapons that require little more than a firing tube. They can be fired remotely, and with known GPS coordinates, present a new security challenge.
The report laid out a hypothetical scenario where terrorists used a single mortar tube and precision rounds to attack the Rose Bowl football game in Pasadena, Calif. In the scenario, terrorists would have previously staked out the GPS coordinates for a section of the bleachers. In the middle of the football game, in a hidden canyon 10 kilometers away, they would then set up a mortar tube, fire off four GPS-guided rounds and drive off in a waiting van. Each round would drop 54 small grenades that would detonate in the air above the crowd, instantly killing dozens.
RAND says there is a narrow "window of opportunity" to control the proliferation of these types of weapons that may close within a few years, and recommended that the Department of Homeland Security take the lead in imposing sales and export controls on advanced mortar rounds. For example, the digital circuitry on GPS-equipped devices can be designed to require a "trusted component" that could limit where the weapons could be used, or they could be given expiration dates, the report noted.
The report also identified four additional advanced weapons:
- Modern sniper technologies, such as night-vision scopes and inexpensive ballistic computers that account for wind and temperature changes, enable relatively unskilled shooters to hit a target more than a mile away. Many of these technologies are widely available on the open market.
- Next-generation small arms, including computer-controlled smart grenades that detonate above targets or around corners; armor-piercing bullets that can defeat any known body armor; and rifle-launched, thermobaric warheads that offer greatly enhanced firepower. A small group of attackers equipped with these weapons could readily overwhelm guards at critical facilities, such as nuclear power or chemical plants, according to the report.
- Cheap and easy-to-use long-range anti-tank weapons that can destroy almost any vehicle from up to two miles away; they can also destroy a speaking platform or small building.
- Large, limpet-type, magnetic mines can be attached to ship hulls and other platforms such as oil rigs by underwater swimmers. With a limpet mine, terrorists could circumvent cargo inspection for explosives and threaten cruise ships and ocean-going ferries.
COMMENTS
- Mr. Yedinak - RAND does not use the term "small arms" in the title of the report. The term used by RAND is "Advanced Conventional Weapons." It was probably a reporter, or less likely a RAND PR flak, who used the term "small arms." You may be right that precision sniper rifles have been around for centuries, but your comment misses the point. RAND is discussing advanced sniper aids, such as PC-based aiming systems, that greatly enhance sniper range and accuracy without the need for the kind of advanced training required for unassisted marksmen. Your assertion that the other weapons and technologies described in the report (other than GPS guidance) have been around for decades is also unfounded, as you would see if you read the report. The RAND report states that none of the advanced conventional weapons they examined, with the exception of GPS-guided indirect fire weapons (i.e., mortars) has the potential to be a "game-changer" in the security force/terrorist competition. Thus, while you may be right in saying that the article reeks of scare tactics and hidden agendas, the same cannot be said for the RAND report. It examines an issue of potential concern and makes solid observations and recommendations for some relatively straight forward design features that could, much as the Vassenar Arrangements have done for shoulder-fired anti-air missiles (MANPADS), greatly reduce the risks posed by these weapons. For the other weapons types considered in the report, RAND does identify some common-sense - and low or even no cost - changes in security force Standard Operating Procedures. Only one "game-changer" and no recommendations for high-cost technology solutions - does that really sound to you like scare tactics and hidden agendas? It doesn't to me. By way of full disclosure, I was the sponsor for the RAND study which generated this report. Bob Ross Posted November 15, 2007 11:11 PM
- But Mr. Yedinak, Rand wouldn't publish worthless information, would they? Do you have any idea how much the government pays them to maintain their "research" center to come up with these reports? Advocator Posted November 15, 2007 12:28 PM
- With the exception of "precision" sniper rifles (which have been around for centuries) NONE of the systems listed are small arms (which is a well defined category) rather they are more properly defined as light weapons or destructive devices. The whole article reeks of scare tactics, hidden agenda, and half-truths. The technologies and weapons described have been available for decades (other than GPS guidance) and by the way the VT fuze used for air burst was developed in WW-II. AGYedinak Posted November 15, 2007 8:15 AM









