GovernmentExecutive.com

Many agencies closed fiscal 2006 with improvements to their quarterly scores on the President's Management Agenda, with 15 grades improving across the five main initiatives and four dropping.

Notable changes on the Office of Management and Budget's traffic-light style score card ratings, released late Thursday, included a bump for the Defense Department in competitive sourcing from red, signaling unsatisfactory performance, to yellow, for mixed results. Defense has no scores that are green, for success.

The score card saw the most movement in the area of e-government, which slumped during the second-quarter and rebounded only slightly in the third quarter. Two agencies -- the Transportation Department and Small Business Administration -- leapt from red to green, while four others -- the Environmental Protection Agency and the Interior, Justice and State departments -- moved up one level.

Four agencies -- the Agriculture and Health and Human Services departments, NASA and the Social Security Administration -- received lower e-government scores in the most recent quarter. Agencies were almost evenly split on their e-government marks at the upper and lower levels, with eight scoring the coveted green and eight getting the lowest red ranking. Ten agencies hovered at the middle mark of yellow.

In addition to Defense, four agencies gained ground under the competitive sourcing initiative to open jobs not considered core to the government to bids from contractors. Four improved in their ratings for linking program budgets to performance. Two initiatives saw no changes to agency rankings: the all yellow and green human capital management initiative, and the red-bathed financial performance category.

Some agencies were rated on additional initiatives such as faith-based and community services, management of their real property assets, and elimination of erroneous payments. Those scores saw almost no changes in the most recent quarter.

In remarks on the new ratings, OMB Deputy Director for Management Clay Johnson praised agencies for their hard work to improve management. "With clear goals and employee commitment, it is possible to establish the management disciplines necessary to make dramatic improvements in program performance," he said.

Top agency officials take the quarterly management score cards seriously, and the timing for major announcements and new activities is often tied to just before -- or safely after -- scores are finalized. During the past several months, OMB officials have spoken publicly about securing the president's management legacy.

Observers have said the upcoming shift to a Democratic House and Senate could have mixed effects on the administration's management projects.

On the controversial competitive sourcing initiative, some advocates from both the industry and union sides say the initiative has already ground nearly to a halt, with agencies winning more than 80 percent of competitions. Others say the shift could lead to more anti-competition language being inserted into authorization and spending bills. Paul Denett, the new head of procurement at OMB, has said since taking the helm in August that he intends to ramp up competitive sourcing.

Efforts under the financial and human capital management initiatives have mostly been bipartisan, and are not expected to change drastically in the 110th Congress. Lawmakers have been ambivalent about the administration's initiative to rate the effectiveness of virtually every government program -- using the Program Assessment Rating Tool -- to facilitate performance-based budgeting, as well as its strategy of paying for e-government projects by pooling funds from multiple agencies. Those initiatives, critics on both sides of the aisle say, circumvent lawmakers' intentions for program design and agency appropriations.

Post a Comment

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.