TOPICS
TOPICS
Spending bill provision would make transfers of e-gov funds easier
Lawmakers negotiating the final version of the fiscal 2006 Transportation-Treasury spending bill are considering a provision that would make it easier for agencies to transfer money to finance e-government projects.
Conferees are considering whether to include language that would free agencies to transfer money for e-government projects following the submission of a report to the appropriations committees. House-Senate negotiators began meeting last week to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill (H.R. 3058).
The Transportation-Treasury e-government provision would override language in other spending bills that prohibits agencies from transferring money to e-government projects without a 15-day advance notice to Congress. Such a section is included in the conference version of the Commerce, Justice and State fiscal 2006 spending bill, which the House has approved.
Agencies have often interpreted the advance-notice clause to mean they must wait for congressional approval before transferring e-government money. Such legislative vetoes over the executive branch decisions have been illegal since Supreme Court ruled in INS v. Chadha, but Congress typically expects agencies to comply with a de facto veto nonetheless.
"The House and Senate committees have told agencies that they shouldn't move forward with the transfer of funds for e-gov without approval," said Senate Appropriations Committee spokeswoman Jenny Manley. "Legally they can, as a general practice they do not."
During fiscal 2005, which ended Sept. 30, the Commerce Department did not transfer money for e-government until the last day of the fiscal year, despite having submitted its advance notice in March.
Lawmakers have said the notification-and-wait clause within spending bills is necessary because the e-government effort moves money from agency to agency without sufficient oversight. The Office of Management and Budget should request money for e-government projects within a separate line item and should not force agencies to pony up funds from their own appropriated accounts, many congressional sources say.
GovExec Live!
Conspicuously missing from Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's July strategy for a departmental reorganization, was a plan to merge two troubled law enforcement agencies. Calls for connecting the bureaus of Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement had been circulating for some time, and continue despite Chertoff's rejection of the idea. The release of an inspector general report backing a merger is only adding fuel to the fire.
At 12 p.m. EST on Wed., Nov. 16, staff correspondent Justin Rood and GovExec.com reporter Chris Strohm will answer your questions about the recommended merger and management challenges facing the Homeland Security Department. You can submit your questions early or during the live online discussion.
Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.