TOPICS
TOPICS
Budget observers predict crunch on spending
A growing budget deficit, combined with the financial crisis and its likely responses, will force the next president to rein in spending initiatives, budget observers said Wednesday. "Both candidates are going to have to limit their initiatives dramatically," Leon Panetta, former OMB director under President Bill Clinton, said at a meeting on budget issues convened by the Committee for a Responsible Budget.
Proposals under Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois or Republican nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona would add about $400 billion to the deficit, he added. He recommended the next president lay out a five-year strategy that would deal with the financial crisis in the short-term but lead to deficit restraint over the longer term, such as reform of entitlement programs and enforcement of pay/go. Panetta's comments come after CBO estimated Tuesday that the federal budget deficit was about $438 billion in fiscal 2008 -- $276 billion more than the shortfall recorded in 2007. The fiscal year ended Sept. 30.
For the short term, many experts believe that another stimulus package will be needed. "I think we do need a short-run stimulus package," despite the fact that it would require issuing more debt to pay for it with the hope the foreign investors will continue to buy it, said Alice Rivlin, a fellow at the Brookings Institution and former director of the CBO. "We have borrowed a lot. But ... if we let our economy fall into depression we would be in even worse trouble, so we have to take the chance that we can borrow some more and get out of this recession."
After failing to get the second stimulus package, which cost $61 billion, signed into law before breaking for the year, House Democratic leaders discussed the possibility of a new stimulus plan during a conference call Tuesday, according to senior aides. Exact details of the new package and when it may be brought to the floor for a vote remain unclear, but sources said an announcement from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., about the package is possible by early next week. Democratic leaders have discussed returning to session this month to vote on economic legislation before the November election. A Pelosi spokesman said no decision has been made on the matter.
Another Democratic House leadership aide suggested that party leaders do not want to raise the markets' hopes by getting a stimulus package only through the House and not the Senate -- an indication that such legislation might make more sense next year with a new Congress and president. Rudolph Penner, a fellow at the Urban Institute and a former CBO director, said the growing budget deficit and surging issuance of federal debt should preclude any short-term stimulus. But David Walker, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former chief of GAO, said that more details of the package need to be known before it can be judged.
"Not all economic stimulus plans are of equal merit and have equal impact," Walker said. It really depends to a great extent on what is the size, what is the nature of it, and what is the likely impact going to be." Walker also recommended that a bipartisan commission be established to take on the entitlement reform, as well as tax reform, while Rivlin countered that the commission could not come up with a grand solution for all those issues. Instead, she recommended Social Security reform first as a way to build confidence toward overhauling other programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and tax reform.
Christian Bourge contributed to this story.
COMMENTS
- If the average American citizen managed our financial debt like Congress manages our national finances we would all be broke! (actually is that not exactly what is happening?). When as a person, do you give money away, when you are knee deep in debt and cannot pay your current bills? That is what the idiots are talking about by implementing another stimulus package. Why does the American citizen have NO problem with the Federal Government taking over part ownership of our banks?? If the Federal Government takes part ownership in our names and starts running the banks they will control your life, mine, and put us more into debt. Who do you think has been monitoring and running Freddie and Fannie --- America, please wake up and get government out of free enterprise or it will not be free for long. The automobile industry, airlines should never have been bailed out, free enterprise means if you cannot make money you get out of the business or go bankrupt. It does not mean Federal Government takes care of me! Now the Federal Government is going to bail out the Banks that made bad loans to people who could not afford to buy a home(The Banks and the Government allowed ACORN to blackmail them). They are going to decrease the worth of the property, decrease the interest, and decrease the morgage payment so people that were poor loan risk can keep their houses. Tell me Middle class Average Joe out there WHO is going to decrease your interest rate, pay your credit card bills, your mortgages, and pay the college loans you took out for your kids? Answer - No one, you are on your own! The poor are taken care of by the Government, the rich are taken care of by the Government, and the middle class average joe takes care of himself. annie Posted October 9, 2008 9:50 AM
- The current 'reality show' version of presidential election politics continues to obscure the basic underlying fact that the next president will be substantially helped or hindered in realizing his 'plans' by the next Congress. While Sarah Palin coverage is 24/7, the public is losing sight not only of their own local races, but of the big picture 'which party is going to be the majority' question. Past experience has taught us that this has fundamental impacts on what actually happens *after* the election. New voters may be unaware that this issue exists, never mind that it can and should figure into their own voting decisions. Louise Kosta Posted October 9, 2008 10:44 AM
- Liberal democrats created this mess and have been running for shelter blaming Bush. I notice that ACORN is under increasing investigation for fraud and voter manipulation. This is the same organization that Obama work for with $$ from the domestic terrorist Bill Ayres Dan ketter Posted October 9, 2008 10:06 AM









