TOPICS
TOPICS
SBA claims progress on women-owned business program
The Small Business Administration on Thursday announced it is circulating a proposal that will pave the way for implementation of a program to help women-owned small businesses win more government contracts. But advocates of the program say they have yet to see any details.
Regulatory changes are necessary before the program, mandated by Congress seven years ago to help agencies reach a goal of giving 5 percent of contracting dollars to women-owned small businesses, can take off.
SBA officials announced Thursday that they had submitted for interagency review a comprehensive rule to govern the program. The same day, SBA Administrator Steve Preston testified before the House Small Business Committee that the agency was doing everything it could to enact the plan.
"I agree that it is taking a long time, and it's taking too long, and it's taking longer certainly than we expected it would," Preston said at the hearing. "So I share your frustration, and I understand it."
Preston said the agency is dedicated to increasing opportunities for women-owned small businesses through increased accountability and transparency, support from agency district offices and better technology to match agencies with the best women-owned businesses.
Margot Dorfman, chief executive officer at the Women's Chamber of Commerce, however, is skeptical of the SBA's dedication.
"The Small Business Administration has shown a lack of commitment to the women's program that this very committee has designed," Dorfman testified. "It has been nearly seven years, and it looks like it'll be more than seven years."
An SBA spokeswoman refused to provide specifics on the new rule, and Dorfman said Friday she also is struggling to get information on what is being proposed. The SBA says it is required by law to submit the rule for interagency review before releasing it for public comment, but Dorfman said the review process was supposed to take place months ago while the agency was waiting for a report by the RAND Corp.
"The SBA has tried every way possible to avoid compliance with this law," Dorfman said.
According to the SBA, women-owned small businesses have been winning an increasing share of federal procurement dollars -- 3.4 percent in fiscal year 2006, up 0.3 percent from 2005. Dorfman, however, said women-owned businesses lose $5.6 billion every year that the program is not implemented.
The Women's Chamber is asking that the committee introduce legislation compelling SBA to speed up the program.
"Why should Congress not act?" said Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y., chairwoman of the committee, on Thursday. "We will."
COMMENTS
- I'm certainly glad that this is still in the works as I am a "women owned" business and it’s not a front, I’m also a Service Disabled Veteran and have Indian heritage to boot. While there are a great many companies that are not always ethical it shouldn't be the general consensus for this or anything else for this matter. Just like all people from the south are ignorant and certain ethnicities are rich because they horde money………. There is nothing common about a standard and I can’t wait to get this to take affect. I would love to have another opportunity to work in the favor of any disadvantaged company and I really don’t care which SBA designator they have. Robyn Posted October 12, 2007 12:41 PM
- The Women Owned Business is in most cases a sham or shell game. Just as the 8a business is. Most business's are only a front by someone else or a broker. In most cases the supposedly owner is only a front person who has no idea what it takes to do the business they supposedly own. They have no experience and have not started or built the business. Once given a government job, (at a much higher cost than if the contract had been bid open and competitive), they will hire project managers and contractors to accomplish the real work al the time sitting in a 2-3 room suite rented and expensed as job overhead. A lot of the women owned businesses are businesses previously owned by the women's husband or male associate and then changed to ownership by the women to meet WOB status and requirements. Just more welfare and more ways for politicians to buy votes at tax payers expense. I'm a government employee and I see it every day. SATOS Posted October 10, 2007 7:48 AM
- I agree with Kim, I'd like to see this program grow and flourish. Women may outnumber men by one way of counting, but certainly not when veiwing business opportunities available. However, what about the unfortunate situation of "using" a woman's name on the owner line, when behind the scenes the company is actually staffed by the same demographic as any of the larger companies staffied primarily by the white guys? I've actually met people who bragged that they did this to get better opportunities - in the days when small bizzes got them. AF HR Type Posted October 9, 2007 1:36 PM
