TOPICS

During his first press briefing on Monday, the government's new personnel chief said one of his priorities is ensuring that agency leaders take responsibility for workforce issues, including the hiring process.

"I think that each agency, they have to be totally accountable for human capital," said Michael Hager, director of the Office of Personnel Management. "There's only one thing that makes everything function, and that's human capital... The leadership at the top absolutely owns it."

He noted that he worked at Banc One Corp. during a period when the company was bringing on more than 10,000 new employees annually. That experience made him realize the importance of a smooth hiring process, he said. Hager assigned regional leaders to oversee hiring and required them to report back regularly.


RELATED STORIES

Hager added that his experience at the Veterans Affairs Department, where he sought to minimize the time it took to hire new employees, also would inform his approach to OPM's new hiring roadmap.

It's not enough for agencies simply to meet the goal of filling new positions within 80 days of posting them, Hager said. As soon as a major agency or department sets a record for speed, that benchmark will become the next governmentwide goal, he added.

"What I call the hiring thing, in my opinion for HR, is the single biggest customer issue that we have," Hager said.

As associate administrator in the Office of Capital Access at the Small Business Administration he realized "that was a big deal," he added. "I was not in HR and I constantly complained about the hiring thing. At VA, literally from the day I interviewed, the hiring thing was the biggest irritant we had at the VA."

Hager also said he would work to make the transition to a new presidential administration smooth, though he did not provide much detail.

The new OPM chief sounded cautionary notes on direct hire authority and the troubled RetireEZ contract, and he downplayed reports of a dispute with House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., over a proposal to move some federal employees to a four-day workweek.

Hager said OPM should retain its authority to sign off on direct hiring. His predecessor, Linda Springer, had approved some expansions of that authority such as letting agencies fill certain acquisition positions through direct hires.

"I do think you have to be very careful with direct hire authority," he said. "I think in some places it works well. You do not want to create a policy or a philosophy that would distract from our desire to hire veterans."

And Hager said he would not make a decision about how to proceed with the RetireEZ contract until sometime in October. OPM officials suspended that contract in late May after they decided that Hewitt Associates had done an unsatisfactory job developing a new retirement calculator, dealing a blow to one of Springer's priorities.

Hager also said he thought that he and Hoyer actually were not very far apart on the goal of promoting flexible schedules for more federal employees. Hoyer has called for agencies to move more employees to a four-day workweek with longer daily schedules, and asked OPM to provide more details on how many employees would be eligible. Hager and Hoyer have not yet spoken directly about the issue.

"We have a wonderful set of programs, where flexible schedules, [telework], are available," Hager said. "Almost 50 percent of our population participates in these programs."

But he said alternate schedules should not be mandatory.

"Explain that to someone who needs child care," Hager said. "They won't take my child for 11 hours a day. We'd rather say, 'Does it fit for you?'"

COMMENTS

  • The hiring process? What process is it? It is so crazy that it takes between nine and twelve months to fill a position where I work after somone quits or retires. Just can't understand the whole hiring thing. I've been looking to move to a different job within DON (Navy) but it's so corrupt and "Good 'ol Boy" I'm not sure if I will even get this WG-10 position I'm applying for and I have 3 yrs and nine months vested in DOD. I have worked in that same position in the Navy and as a DOD contractor for 12 years. The person who may get the job is not even in DOD. He's an outsider. Is that fair? Not! I'm probably going to take it to the UNION if I don't get the job. I never had to deal with this kind of process during my 20 year Naval career. It would be like telling you we are sorry you did NOT get promoted or the ORDERS you wanted in the Navy because we gave it/them to someone in the Army! What's that all about!
  • Oh and this is particularly directed at our supposed "intelligence" services. If you're so intelligent, how come you have been unable to accomplish any of the major goals set forth a mere 7 years ago? Where did you spend all this money? Who has taken responsibilty for your waste? The amount of shame and public ridicule that these people should be subjected to should have no bounds. Publish their pictures coupled with not only their salaries but in addition their budgetary provisions and state exactly to the citizens of this country. WHAT did you do with the money?
  • I am a Law School Graduate and I can honestly say having attempted this before in 2000. The federal employee hiring process is rife with corruption and mismanagement. Hiring among federal agencies is not about applicant qualifications or even about obtaining goals set forth by administrative officials. It is the highest form of corrupt patronage. Patriotism is not measured by some foolish nonsense designed to provide zero results while paying employees well over what they would earn in private sector employment. It's a joke... always has been and to have people make silly commentary as if you have worked to provide good service to citizens is hilarious to read since I would venture to guess that I have done just a bit more "work" than some of the people trying to sell this nonsense to people.